Quantcast
Channel: Morgoth's Review
Viewing all 541 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

The Last Whites Of The East End

May 27, 2016, 10:45 am
$
0
0




"Have you ever wondered, perhaps, why opinions which the majority of people quite naturally hold are, if anyone dares express them publicly, denounced as 'controversial, 'extremist', 'explosive', 'disgraceful', and overwhelmed with a violence and venom quite unknown to debate on mere political issues? It is because the whole power of the aggressor depends upon preventing people from seeing what is happening and from saying what they see." Enoch Powell.







This week the BBC broke with all protocol and historical precedent by airing a documentary which was somewhat sympathetic toward the White British who've been ethnically cleansed by the British establishment. 

There was some element of the usual BBC trickery, for example, one of the most prominent of the 'White British' fleeing Newham, the East London Borough where this was filmed, was mixed race, half Black/White who was married to a Romanian woman, they had a young daughter, another young man was half Indian and one of the people most sympathetic toward the fleeing Whites was a Bangladeshi. But nevertheless, the BBC broadcast a documentary in which White British people who're being ethnically cleansed had an opportunity to look  straight into the camera and say ''We're being ethnically cleansed!''. Usually, when the BBC report on 'sensitive issues' they neuter the content by overlaying a moronic slapstick-lite soundtrack to make it all seem a bit of lark, Last Whites of the East End was mercifully spared it.


 The demographic transformation of the old Cockney East End has been brutal, the 2011 census reported that White British were down to 16% of the population, and that was taken 6 years ago, it is now estimated to be 12%. Within that, wards such as Green Street East and Green Street West are now 4,8% White British(!). It cannot be stated enough, there was no democratic mandate whatsoever for any of this, there was no public debate, nobody voted for it, indeed, as we shall see, the British establishment did everything they could to stop the East End Cockneys voting their way out of it via the BNP. If any other ethnic or racial group had been treat in this manner by their own political class it would be considered a crime against humanity.

 The general tone of the documentary can be summed up as one of loss and loneliness, the passing of an age. The Oakham family have always been in the East End, their ancestors were the 'salt of the earth' Cockneys Charles Dickens wrote about. The matriarch of the family, Debbie, is preparing herself for the flight of her one of her daughters, the daughter has two children and, like so many others, has decided they should not be brought up as a White minority. Debbie understands but nevertheless, it's just another bond being severed, another little strand of East End history being cut.

 Muslims don't drink so all the pubs went under, all that remains is a dilapidated working men's club held aloft on the pensions of those too old and too poor to leave Newham. The landlord of the club describes the club as an ''oasis'' where the Whites can ''mix with their own''. The grizzled old Cockneys spend their time in the club drinking lager and engaging in nostalgia, remember the year that...what about the time Charlie....oh he was one alright!. The imbecilic Leftist on Twitter might quip ''They came here because you went there'' and the club certainly gives an impression of actually being a long forgotten colonial outpost, lager, darts and old women ballroom dancing as the Black and Brown Islamic masses shuffle passed just yards away outside.

 Mixed race Tony laments the passing of an age ''It's all gone'' in times gone by Tony was made to feel uncomfortable because he was too dark, now he's a minority again because he's too White, and with a young daughter he too is now fleeing to the White Flight safe haven of Essex. Because as Tony explains, nobody, absolutely nobody, wants to bring up a little girl in an area dominated by Muslim men. 

The BBC's soap-opera "Eastenders" which is set in London's East End is often criticized for it's non White quota, in reality, as a reflection of the East End, Whites are hugely over-represented, making up around 70-80% of the cast. If the soap was to accurately portray London's East End it would be radically different. There would be subtitles throughout most of the show, non Whites would make up 88% of the actors and the story lines would centre on the interactions between Somalians, Nigerians, Jamaicans, Pakistanis etc. The Queen Victoria pub would have closed down years ago and turned into Mosque or government funded African out-reach centre. Nobody would watch the show because nobody could possibly identify with such a ''community'' they would switch off, just like the real life East Enders ran off. 

 During the course of the documentary various people ask how this could happen, the Bangladeshi interviewed scorns the Whites for simply ''throwing in the towel'' and leaving without a fight. Tony tells an anecdote, a young White woman he knew was physically and verbally attacked by a Somalian girl, she was called a ''White slag''. Tony asked the White girl why she didn't fight back, why put up with it? she replied that she couldn't, she was White and if she tried to do anything she'd be accused of racism and her life would be destroyed, safer and easier to just be insulted, and the non-Whites know it. Others in the documentary have other, similar, stories to tell. So in a sense they've answered their question. Whites could never fight back, the game was rigged against them from the start, anything they did would be called racist, and indeed, when they tried to mount a defence by voting for the BNP that is exactly what happened.

There's a recurring theme in British politics, Whites will happily vote for Labour or Conservative, they'll carry on voting for them as their areas begin to change racially, but then, at last, when it's obviously an attempt to socially engineer them out of existence, they desperately ''lurch to the Right'' but it's always too little too late, it's the last scream before the fall of the axe. This trend was seen in areas of Yorkshire and London during the 2000's with the BNP. As The Guardian reported at the time:


 The far right British National party is to field a candidate in the race to become executive mayor of the east London borough of Newham.
The news comes on the same day that the home secretary, David Blunkett, attacked the BNP's "vile racism" and called on politicians of all parties to fight against the far right's influence in next month's local elections.
Newham has traditionally been Labour-dominated and if the BNP is to win it has to defeat Sir Robin Wales, the council's current leader and clear favourite for the mayoral job.
The party's platform includes plans to cut back all local spending on projects that promote multiculturalism, halting any expenditure on asylum seekers and giving "local British people" priority on housing waiting lists.



By 2005 so many of the White British in London boroughs were panicking that the BNP looked to set to make serious electoral gains. So much so that the entire political and metropolitan establishment, with the BBC playing a central role, united in a concerted effort to destroy the BNP. 
The Guardian''Parties unite to try to drive BNP off London council''



Little has distinguished Warren Northover from any other backroom activist during his five years in the Labour Party. He has attended meetings, stuck down envelopes, handed out leaflets and canvassed for two MPs. But today the silver-haired taxi driver becomes the key figure in a cross-party effort to resist the drive into London of the racist British National Party and to stop it gaining a foothold in the south-east.
 In today's byelection in the Goresbrook ward of Barking and Dagenham, Mr Northover, 70, will try to wrest back the BNP's only council seat in the capital.
It was relinquished when Daniel Kelley, who won the ward last September, stood down citing ill health. But the extremists see the retention of Goresbrook as key to a wider plan to capture a block of seats at next year's council elections. They have the springboard of having secured 16.9% per cent of the vote in Barking at the general election and the knowledge that 10 council seats could fall with just a 5% swing.
 But other parties are determined to stop them. Both the Liberal Democrats and the Greens have withdrawn their candidates to give Mr Northover a better chance, and the Tories have fought a vigorous campaign. The seat will also be contested by UKIP, which could drain votes away from the far right.
In recognition of the importance being accorded to the contest, the Home Office minister Hazel Blears visited the ward on Monday. The campaign has been assisted by a coalition of anti-racist activists, church groups and trades unions.
Many dispute the motivations of the BNP, claiming that Nick Griffin was a stooge and the whole party a setup, but the point here is that the British establishment was absolutely determined to destroy the ethnic and cultural composition of Cockney, White working class London, and that short of some IRA style terror campaign there was nothing the Whites could do about it. And so they fled, to stay and do nothing meant to live in what amounted to Pakistan, Somalia or Bangladesh, to protest left you open to attack by the entire governing and media class, as well as violent attacks at the hands of their  UAF thug gangs. Escape was the only option.

 An entire culture and ethnic group, the heart of historical London, now scattered across White Flight zones dotted around South England. And it still isn't enough...


The hour-long programme, aired last night, focused on the disappearing traditional Cockney culture in the London borough of Newham.
Some who tuned in were so offended by the opinions expressed that they compared it to white supremacy propaganda.
"Hitler documentary in the afternoon, #KKK documentary just finished and now #LastWhitesOfTheEastEnd? F**king British TV at its racist best," fumed one viewer on Twitter.

The reaction of the Liberal Left to the documentary was tediously predictable, in The Mirror reported:
The hour-long programme, aired last night, focused on the disappearing traditional Cockney culture in the London borough of Newham.
Some who tuned in were so offended by the opinions expressed that they compared it to white supremacy propaganda.
"Hitler documentary in the afternoon, #KKK documentary just finished and now #LastWhitesOfTheEastEnd? F**king British TV at its racist best," fumed one viewer on Twitter.
Another then posted: "Just caught up with #LastWhitesOfTheEastEnd on iplayer. A documentary on life in Newham, where I was born & bred. What a load of racist tosh."
The White British were called racist when they objected to the first immigrants, they were called racist again when they said they were worried about becoming outnumbered and then, finally, they were called racist one last time when they simply left the area. The rodents of the Left are not magnanimous in victory, their hatred is boundless. 

It's quite possible that one of the reasons the Liberal Left loathed this documentary wasn't just their ideals being exposed as a sham at best and genocidal at worst, it was because many of the vacating Whites were answering questions which preempted Left Liberal thinking. Debbie's daughter, Amy, explained straight out that she ''preferred her own (White) kind'' and then added ''nobody minds when the Asians do the same''. The standard response to White Flight by the Liberals has been to cite ''fluctuating house prices'' it's just people being upwardly mobile, and they're saying this in response to the documentary, despite the White British looking directly into the camera and saying ''I'm leaving because it feels like a foreign land''.

 The Last Whites of the East End left me feeling surprisingly optimistic. One of the most terrifying words a Nationalist can come across is ''integration'' and what this documentary made clear was that integration isn't happening on the scale our enemies expected, our people are segregating themselves. It was the story of a battle lost, but not by any means the end of the war.









↧
Search

The ''Nazi EU'' Conspiracy

May 31, 2016, 1:07 pm
$
0
0

If Only...





There's a surprisingly large segment within the British cuckservative Right who, when they look across the channel at Europe today and the European Union which governs us, at Europeans suffocating under mountains of falsely generated debt, at millions of Muslims and non Whites flooding our homelands, at the mass rape of European women by those non Whites, at the Hate Speech laws which silence us and the fanatical doctrines of anti-racism...these Britcucks then look upon all of this and think:

 ''Yes, yes, it's clear to me now, Nazis won the war and are running the European Union, we are living in the Fourth Reich!''

Boris Johnson recently alluded to the EU  being comparable to a Nazi Empire, UKIP MEP Gerard Batten defended Johnson and went further still, pointing to his own research on the subject. You see the ''Nazi EU'' meme splattered all over comments sections and twitter accounts and blogs leaning toward the EU-sceptic Right of British politics, you hear it in the pub, one of the more common phrases is ''The Germans are doing with peace what they couldn't do by war''. One nut-job has even written a book called'The EU: The Truth About The Fourth Reich - How Hitler Won The Second World War'



"It is no coincidence that just about every country in the European Union is getting poorer while Germany continues to get richer and richer.
 "We may think we won the Second World War. But we lost. It is no surprise that we are all living in the Fourth Reich.
"Knowingly or not those who support and defend the European Union are supporting the Nazi legacy."
 "It was Funk who predicted the coming of European economic unity. Funk was also Adolf Hitler's economics minister and his key economics advisor."
It continues: "The Nazis wanted to get rid of the clutter of small nations which made up Europe and their plan was quite simple. The EU was Hitler's dream."




This conspiracy theory reeks of a petty little Englander mentality, in an age when all Europeans are being phased out via mass immigration it's divisive and self defeating, it also betrays an astounding ignorance of National Socialism and modern Europe.

 UKIP's Gerard Batten's blog post offers us a convenient entry into trying to understand this myth, Batten writes:


  In 1942 when the German’s still thought they were going to win the war they produced a report entitled the Europaische Wirtschafts Gemeinschaft – which translates as theEuropean Economic Community.
  This report was written by various bankers and academics and laid out a plan for how Germany would manage the economies of the conquered countries of Europe after a German victory.  The report was drawn up under the leadership of Professor Walter Funk the Reich’s Economics Minister and President of the Reichsbank.
 The report contained sections on Agriculture, Industry, Employment, Transport, Trade, Economic Agreements, and Currency.  It proposed the ‘harmonisation’ of European currencies and a harmonised currency system.
 If this all sounds all very familiar it is because the basic plan for the European Economic Community of 1942 was very similar to the actual European Economic Community that came into existence in 1957 under the Treaty of Rome.
So the point here is that National Socialist Germany had plans which, in the event of a victory, would be implemented throughout Europe, under German guidance. But what matters is not that such plans existed but what their ideological and philosophical aims were, a united Europe is one thing, the question is why unite it and for what end. It isn't very difficult to imagine how a Nationalist Socialist European Union would be because the National Socialists told us their views on pretty much everything. So it's simply a matter of comparing the present EU to National Socialist principles and ideals and seeing if they are similar, or even comparable.


A consistent theme within the National Socialist world view is that financial institutions and Big Business should not rule the people, that they must play a subservient role in the life of the nation and not intrude upon or disrupt the life of the people. As the 'The  Program of the NSDAP'explains:
 ''....Once these two points are achieved, it means a victory of their approaching universalist ordering of society in the true state over the present-day separation of state, nation and economics under the corrupting influence of the individualist theory of society(Liberalism) as now constructed. The sham state of today, oppressing the working classes and protecting the pirated gains of bankers and stock exchange speculators, is the area for reckless private enrichment and for the lowest political profiteering; it gives no thought to its people, and provides no high moral bond of union. The power of money, most ruthless of all powers, holds absolute control, and exercises corrupting, destroying influence on state, nation, society, morals, drama, literature and on all matters of morality, less easy to estimate.''
So does the EU of today put the interest of Europeans before the interests of money and business? well, as The Guardian reports:
"Thousands of companies, banks, law firms, PR consultancies and trade associations are there to bend ears and influence the regulations and laws that shape Europe's single market, fix trade deals, and govern economic and commercial behaviour in a union of 507 million.
Lobbying is a billion-euro industry in Brussels. According to Corporate Europe Observatory, a watchdog campaigning for greater transparency, there are at least 30,000 lobbyists in Brussels, nearly matching the 31,000 staff employed by the European commission and making it second only to Washington in the concentration of those seeking to affect legislation. Lobbyists sign a transparency register run by the parliament and the commission, though it is not mandatory.
By some estimates, they influence 75% of legislation".
And so it's safe to assume that a political organization containing 30,000(!) business lobbyists vying for influence and control over the European populace as a serf class, was not what Adolf Hitler or the National Socialist Party had intended. National Socialists were equally damning in their indictment of international banks and their enslavement of Europe through usury/interest as they were of the cooperate lobby groups, again from The  Program of the NSDAP:


   "Thralldom of interest is the real expression for the antagonisms, capital versus labor, blood versus money, creative work versus exploitation. The necessity of breaking this thralldom is of such vast importance for our nation and our race, that on it alone depends our nation’s hope of rising up from its shame and slavery; in fact, the hope of recovering happiness, prosperity and civilization throughout the world. It is the pivot on which everything turns; it is far more than a mere necessity of financial policy. Whilst its principles and consequences bite deep into political and economic life, it is a leading question for economic study, and thus affects every single individual and demands a decision from each one: Service to the nation or unlimited private enrichment. It means a solution of the Social Question.(9)
The fact that today great economic enterprises cannot be set on foot without recourse to loans is sheer lunacy. Here is where reasonable use of the state’s right to produce money which might produce most beneficial results.”(11)
This is absolutely not what any reasonable person could call ''fence sitting'' on the issue of debt and financial enslavement to debt and interest, it is an unequivocal refutation of it and rejection of it and replacement of it in its entirety. If the European Union was now under the influence of National Socialist ideals Europe would be debt free, indeed, the ((bankers)) would be lucky to be alive, so is this the case in modern Europe?


As we can see, almost all economic activity in the core European Union Nations is predicated on servicing debt and paying interest, the actual debt is never meant to be paid off, the aim is to literally enslave Europeans via interest or ((usury)). So the economic argument for the EU being a Nazi institution is a non-starter.

Another line of reasoning that Nazi EU theorists use, as they must, is that the German people, as a people, have benefited from the EU being a Nazi plot. For example, under National Socialism the German birth rate soared, if we are all living under a Nazi Empire now then we can expect to see that happening in Germany right now, can't we?. In actual fact the German birth rate is one of the lowest in the world, this is largely due to German women being shoved into the factory and the office as consumer/prodcer slaves and feminism, both of which would have appalled National Socialists. Even without immigrants swarming by the million into Germany under these conditions Germans would eventually go extinct. 

 The National Socialist ''25 Point Plan'' tells us exactly where they stood on immigration and diversity:


4. Only those who are our fellow countrymen can become citizens. Only those who have German blood, regardless of creed, can be our countrymen. Hence no Jew can be a countryman.
 5. Those who are not citizens must live in Germany as foreigners and must be subject to the law of aliens.
 8. Any further immigration of non-Germans must be prevented. We demand that all non-Germans who have entered Germany since August 2, 1914, shall be compelled to leave the Reich immediately.

In 2015 more than 1 Million non-White immigrants entered Germany against the express wishes of the German people. Within just 4 years Germans in the 18-30 age range will be a minority in their country if these trends continue. And a frighteningly large part of the mainstream Right in Britain still believe this is what Adolf Hitler would have wanted for Germany!
 On New Years eve in Cologne immigrants carried out a series of mass sexual assaults on German women. Hundreds of German women were molested on the streets of Germany by non-White men, and then the local press buried the story. Now lets just imagine that by some miracle a few thousand non-Whites had managed to enter Nazi Germany, and then organized themselves into rape gangs. Would the German people have reacted with indifference and the media buried the story? or would every last non-White male have been rounded up and shot or, if he was lucky, thrown into a concentration camp?

This is the worst conspiracy theory of all time!


 And yet it infests the weak tea conservatives of Britain, it took me all of 2 minutes to go to a Breitbart London thread and find this:


It would be quite easy to write a 10,000 word post detailing just how moronic this thinking is, what's more important is to try and understand why they think it. Leaving aside petty inter-ethnic squabbling and chauvinism, and ((outside influence)) who encourage this muddled thinking, the problem is really one of people living in a 2 dimensional world trying to understand a 3 dimensional world. They resemble the 'Flatlanders' of pop scientists:
  
In their world view Nazis equate to evil, so having established that the EU, political correctness and Muslim immigration is evil they have, logically to them, concluded that somehow Nazis must be involved, even when what they regard as the new evil runs diametrically against everything the Nazis stood for. The two figures in the picture above represent our cuckservatives, the EU and Muslims, say, are the sphere, but living in their Flatworld they can only see the bottom of the sphere, and are drawing their conclusions from that.

One of the great many mistakes the Flatlander cuckservatives have made is to think of National Socialism as an objective evil, and not as a reactionary and anti-liberal political philosophy, because if they did, then the question has to be answered 'Who or what were the Nazis reacting to?' could it have been people such as Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi a ''pioneer of European integration'' and who wrote the book 'Pan-Europa' decades before Nazis drew up their plans? more famously Coudenhove-Kalergi wrote:


The man of the future will be of mixed race. Today's races and classes will gradually disappear owing to the vanishing of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future, similar in its appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals.

Kalergi was, then, what we might call an ''internationalist'' and though not Jewish himself he was definitely philo-Semitic:
"Instead of destroying European Jewry, Europe, against its own will, refined and educated this people into a future leader-nation through this artificial selection process. No wonder that this people, that escaped Ghetto-Prison, developed into a spiritual nobility of Europe. Therefore a gracious Providence provided Europe with a new race of nobility by the Grace of Spirit. This happened at the moment when Europe's feudal aristocracy became dilapidated, and thanks to Jewish emancipation".
And this paid off well because Kalergi and his work to create a pan-European 'Eurasian-Negroid' was enthusiastically backed by extremely powerful Jewish banking magnates:
"According to his autobiography, at the beginning of 1924 his friend Baron Louis de Rothschild(Jewish) introduced him to Max Warburg(Jewish) who offered to finance his movement for the next 3 years by giving him 60,000 gold marks. Warburg remained sincerely interested in the movement for the remainder of his life and served as an intermediate for Coudenhove-Kalergi with influential Americans such as banker Paul Warburg(Jewish) and financier Bernard Baruch(Jewish). In April 1924, Coudenhove-Kalergi founded the journal Paneuropa (1924–1938) of which he was editor and principal author. The next year he started publishing his main work, the Kampf um Paneuropa (The fight for Paneuropa, 1925–1928, three volumes). In 1926, the first Congress of the Pan-European Union was held in Vienna and the 2,000 delegates elected Coudenhove-Kalergi as president of the Central Council, a position he held until his death in 1972".
According to Hitler, Kalergi was:
Unfortunately, his Pan-Europeanism earned vivid loathing from Adolf Hitler, who excoriated its pacifism and mechanical economism and belittled its founder as "a bastard."[20][21] Hitler's view of Coudenhove-Kalergi was that the "rootless, cosmopolitan, and elitist half-breed" 
And so if we're to investigate what it was the National Socialists were reacting to, then it's reasonable, indeed, perfectly logical, to conclude that they were reacting to a push by Jewish Money power to destroy the ethnic and racial make-up of Europe and reduce the European population to a mongrel slave class, and this isn't even to mention the Jewish involvement at that time with Bolshevism and Marx, which was only a slightly more unpleasant form of slavery under which Europeans would still toil as slaves under the whip of their Talmudic masters. The same masters who wrote the draft legislation for the European Union, as they themselves proudly boast:
What's remarkable about these conservative Flatlanders is that they're looking for the right thing, but in the wrong place. The Europe we have today is the Europe that was always in the making, before Adolf Hitler ever even climbed onto a podium, but the reason that so many people are stuck in 2 dimensional thinking is precisely because 'history is written by the victors'. 

 Unless, of course, the Flatlanders believe the Nazis also dedicated vast resources into painting themselves as the epitome of evil and that they should never ever question the official narrative.... 









Hat-tip to Augur Mayson for providing sourced material





↧
↧

Donald Trump, Islam & Europe

June 4, 2016, 2:39 am
$
0
0
























You wouldn't think it by paying attention to the whores of Europe's political and media class, but Europeans are potentially just one year away from living in a world in which America has banned Islamic immigration or is in the process of doing so. The fact is a Trump victory in America will expose the European elites, their lefty henchmen and the liberal media as the genocidal obscenities they are, and they are either too stupid to see it or in denial.


 What the liberal class call ''Far Right" parties are on the rise across Europe, even Germany shows some signs of life, this puts the European elites into a game of whack-a-mole in which they frantically run around the continent trying to bash the latest insurgency back into the ground, Austria one week, Hungary the next, France soon. They can play this game because they know they have the tacit approval of their fellow anti-White liberals in the U.S. But what happens when they turn around and discover that the U.S has transformed, not just into another mole, but a 15 foot half tonne bear, and he's no longer on their side?

 Who you gonna run to now, libshits?























Unlike the Islamic invasion, or the suffocating funk of Political Correctness, or the existence of the EU itself, Trump's moratorium on Muslims will be the will of the American people, they will have voted for it. And no amount of howling by blubbery Social Justice weirdos and hysterical editorials in the Guardian can change that. Consequently, Europeans are going to begin asking a few questions, if Americans can vote to stop mass raping terrorists being forced on them then why can't we? who is doing this to us?. The inevitability of ''diversity'' will be brought into doubt.

 A few weeks ago the supposedly conservative Prime Minister of Britain invited the far Left half-caste in chief of the U.S to lecture Britons on why we should hand over our freedom and sovereignty to the EU. The President's word carries weight, he's the ''Leader of the Free World'', in reality few people think of Obama in those terms, and indeed, Leftists such as Obama would wince at the very term ''Free World'' and it's implications of European, White superiority. But Donald Trump certainly will assert himself as the leader of the free world. So how will Europe's liberals react when the most powerful man on earth says things such as:

We've long since passed the point when people thought of the liberal Left as just a bunch of well  meaning dopey hippies, even the Dalai Lama thinks they're nuts!. The masses are starting to notice there's something at the heart of modern liberalism, something ((dark)) something ((evil)) something more ((sinister)) and ((vindictive)) than we ever managed. It's the moment of realising that little Bobby doesn't just like standing on spiders, he has many jars full of spiders with their legs ripped off which he gazes at obsessively.

 And a Trump presidency is going to be like an angry father coming home and asking ''What the hell is going on?!''.











↧

Ramadan 2016: David Cameron's message

June 7, 2016, 10:46 pm
$
0
0




Prime Minister David Cameron's message to mark Ramadan 2016. 


"It’s the holy month of Ramadan, a time when mosques open their doors, community centres welcome in their neighbours, and even churches and synagogues offer up their spaces, as Muslims break their fasts, and people of all faiths and none are often asked to join.






Coventry Cathedral is holding its own multi-faith iftar. In Manchester, they’re combining an iftar with England’s European Championships appearance. And homeless shelters up and down the country are holding afters with the homeless. 


Of course, fasting is what comes to mind when we think of Ramadan. It’s part of the month that really puts Muslims’ faith to the test, especially during these long, warm days. But there is much more to it. There is all the energy and money people donate to those who are less fortunate, and all the extra time spent in prayer and contemplation.

Uppermost in all our minds this Ramadan are those whose lives have been torn apart by the twin evils of Assad and Daesh, all those families spending this holy month in refugee camps, mourning loved ones, yearning to go back to school or to work, wondering whether they’ll ever return home again. Our thoughts, whatever our backgrounds or beliefs, are with them. And we must continue to support the people of Syria and the region, as we work towards a lasting political solution. Because that’s who we are as a country. We won’t walk on by.

So this Ramadan, let’s renew our resolve to help those victims. Let’s continue to come together for iftars and community events. Let’s celebrate the proud, multi-racial, multi-faith democracy we live in. 

To everyone in Britain and around the world, Ramadan Mubarak."

↧

Fear & Loathing In The European Hive-Mind

June 11, 2016, 3:45 am
$
0
0
























Both the Washington Post and The Independent carried the same anti-Trump article this week, according to research coming out of two New York universities, Donald Trump's voters are far more likely to be preoccupied with death than any other demographic group, the researchers,  Sheldon Solomon and Florette Cohen (Yeah, I know) have carried out a series of word association tests and psychological studies and concluded that, subconsciously, the meteoric rise of Donald Trump is due to his ability to tap into a simmering angst among a vast proportion of America's population.

 The Independent:

On television and on the stump, at debates and in speeches, Donald Trump is reminding the American people that they are going to die.
The reminders aren’t explicit, and they probably aren’t part of an intentional strategy. All the same, much of Trump’s rhetoric could have the effect of bringing his viewers’ omnipresent fear of death closer to their conscious minds, according to Sheldon Solomon, a psychologist at Skidmore College in Saratoga Springs, N.Y.
 That includes his emphasis on terrorism, unsurprisingly, but also his preoccupation with immigration. This focus might be helping Trump, since Solomon’s recent research shows that people who are thinking about death are more likely to say they support him.
 Study subjects who were prompted to talk about their own death later rated their support for Trump 1.66 points higher on a five-point scale than those who were prompted to talk about pain generally.
“I’m not suggesting that any of this is calculated, but almost everything that he does is demonstrably effective for raising these non-conscious, existential concerns that in turn make his kind of candidacy all the more alluring,” Solomon said.
So let's get the obvious out of the way, these Jewish academics are talking about White people here, Donald Trump's voting base is overwhelmingly White so what Solomon and Cohen are reporting is that the White people voting for Trump are subconsciously thinking about death and despair and are generally gloomy about the future:

 The participants who had been asked to think about immigration had death on their minds, too — almost to the same extent as those who had been asked to think about death explicitly.
Assigned scores from zero to one based on how many words related to death they produced, those who had been asked to think about immigration scored 0.92 on average, while those who had been asked to think about death scored 0.96. Those asked to think about pain scored just 0.19. There was no evidence that the effect was greater for conservative participants in the study.
Yet the results accord with those of similar studies that suggest people interpret challenges to their culture as threats to their very existence. A different group of researchers found that after a group of Canadians read an article in which Canadian cultural tropes were mocked, they were thinking about death, too.
 Solomon said these results suggest that the fear of death is one of several interrelated psychological concepts that could help explain why Trump has been so successful, including authoritarianism, an aversion to uncertainty and racial prejudice.

It's highly likely that this data will be hurtling its way onto Critical Whiteness studies courses, or some other Social Justice gibberish, but nevertheless, the data, if not the purpose of these tests, is intriguing, what they reveal is that huge numbers of White people are subconsciously associating mass immigration and ''cultural change'' and the general liberal zeitgeist, with death!. The question is...why?

 Most of these people would not consider themselves as 'racist' they will view themselves as good citizens, they have the constitution and dislike what the Americans call ''Identity Politics'' and yet, as these Jewish academics have discovered, there is a latent racial awareness there and they're riddled with angst as a group, as White people.  

In 1950 a White father could rest easy in his bed at night knowing that the nearest Black or Hispanic men were a healthy 1000 miles or so away, the Blacks which were in America were safely segregated. A Norwegian man could sleep easy knowing that the nearest Muslim gangs were 3000 miles away from his daughter. With the possible exception of the Faeroe Islands and the Australian Outback, no White parents can have this peace of mind today. Decade after decade, year on year, they've watched as 'The Other' has incrementally encroached upon their living space, and thus their security, today in many cases that 'safe space' has been reduced to just a few metres.

Nationalists often point out that our advantage is in working with nature while our enemies have to work against nature's grain constantly, if the liberal left, narrative were to be believed then European Americans would not be associating immigration or demographic change with death, unless they had been directly affected, for example, if a White person had lost a family member due to a Black shooting spree or Islamic bomb, then it would be understandable to associate those groups with death. But for these feelings to be held by such a huge number of White voters suggests they are subconsciously reacting as a group. Professor Frank Salter explains it thus:
The result is that friends form an intermediate pool of kinship concentration lying between the ethny and the clan. Within the clan the nuclear family is the most intense concentration of kinship , while geographical races and humanity as a whole are the least concentrated. In descending order of concentration, kinship runs thus: Nuclear family, extended family (clan), friends, ethny, race, humanity.
 
Whether or not these people are racially aware is beside the point, their brains are noticing that the territory and security and resources which its own biological group has access to is being reduced drastically and that this is, fatal, it is death. The internal workings of the mind do not look at the demographic transformation of, say, California, and see diversity, it sees the extinction of its biological counter-parts, the map is literally turning black, the void spreads exponentially.

 When Solomon and Cohen's report finds its way into the SJW brainwashing hub they'll set up a straw-man argument, they'll assume the subjects are ignorant bigoted hicks because there's very little chance of their direct families being blown up or shot by non-Whites. In actual fact it concerns and fears of Trump's voters are hovering around ''ethny'' (White-American). A few weeks ago a White woman was terrorized and threatened and had eggs blasted into her eyes by a non-White mob, that image then goes out across the media and internet and other Whites see it, what they see is one of their own under attack, the problem, of course, is that here too our Jewish academics and Cultural Marxists have been at work, to view such an attack in racial terms would amount to, they would argue, the latent racism and White Privilege of Euro-Centric USA. 



European-Americans are tangled up in a web here, their brains are trying to sound off the alarm bells over loss of territory and racial invaders, while at the same time being hampered and crippled by Jewish intellectualism. It's almost as if by design, as if one collective was waging war upon another, a genocidal war at that. It is the paradoxes and double standards, the general situation and their impotence as a whole, which is leading to a preoccupation with death and gloom.

The goal of the Nationalist is to shift our people's fears and anxieties from the unconscious to the conscious, from latent to explicit and overt, to make them stand tall and demand their own collective interests be realised and to dismantle any organization which tries to stop us. This is what we often refer to as ''The Great Awakening'' all other collective racial and ethnic groups oppose us doing this and unsurprisingly, the Jewish collective oppose us most of all. 

Let's just imagine a hypothetical situation wherein Europeans have achieved a full awakening and regained control of all the organs of the state and the media and financial institutions, we are now using that power to reclaim our territory and secure a safe and happy future for our people. Two academics, Jones and Watson, approach a young Jewish student (who has not yet moved to Israel) and ask him to take part in a series of psychological tests...what would his subconscious be saying then?

 They know this already, of course, which is why they want us to be fearful and threatened rather than themselves, and they're pouring vast resources into maintaining the status-quo, including testing us as a scientist tests rats. It makes sense for them to behave this way from a biological perspective but by that very same reasoning and morality we are obliged to act for our interests, come what may...








↧
↧

Lies, Denial & Narrative Collapse: The Liberal Response to Orlando

June 15, 2016, 10:36 am
$
0
0
In the early hours of Sunday morning Omar Mir Seddique Mateen called 911, and declared his allegiance to ISIS, before going into the Pulse gay nightclub in Orlando, Florida armed with an AR15 rifle and a pistol. He held the occupants hostage for three hours, during which time he shot over one hundred of them, killing fifty, before a SWAT team stormed the building and he was shot dead by the police. Among considerable competition, this was the worst mass shooting in US History and the 44th Islamic terror attack on US soil since 9/11. Islamic terror attacks are now so commonplace that they are met with a roll of the eyes and a shrug of the shoulders rather than the outrage such atrocities deserve. Muslims killing and blowing things up is about as shocking a a dog barking. It's just what they do. 




Of far more interest than the attack itself  is the media and commentariat's attempt to shape the narrative in response to yet another massacre in the name of Islam.  We are all used to the liberal hand wringing and pleas that "this has nothing to do with Islam" that follow these events with such regularity that you could set your watch by them. However, this one was different. The victims were homosexuals and the vast majority of them were non-white (they had been attending an event celebrating Latino Gay Pride weekend when they were slaughtered). One of the left's pet victim groups had attacked another. How would they attempt to square this circle? 

Well, first, they crossed their fingers and hoped that the massacre had been committed by the mythical violent far right extremist. 



Of course, within hours it was revealed that Liberal Christmas (or should that be Winterval?) had not come early, and the attacker was in fact the muslim son of an Afghan immigrant. The father had links to the Taliban and the son had been investigated by the FBI under suspicion of involvement in Islamic extremism/Jihad. How would the liberal narrative shift to accommodate this development, particularly when it appeared to confirm everything that racist Nazi bigot and general embodiment of evil, Donald J Trump, had been saying about the dangers of Islamic immigration? 

Well, Omar was born in New York. The mere presence of Omar's mother on US soil on the day that she expelled him from her uterus was enough to make him as American as apple pie. He wasn't an immigrant therefore Trump's proposals to curtail Islamic immigration would have done nothing to prevent this attack. Completely missing the point that the fact that the children and grandchildren of muslim immigrants are more prone to radicalisation than the original immigrants   is hardly an argument in favour of immigration or the likelihood of muslims ever being successfully assimilated. 



Then we had the sleight of hand and the obfuscation, This wasn't an Islamic terror attack. It was a homophobic terror attack. Just because the gunman himself had declared allegiance to ISIS and reportedly shouted Allahu Akbar during the attack didnt't mean he was motivated by Islam. Oh no, he was just a common or garden homophobe who felt compelled to murder after being repulsed by the sight of two men kissing. In fact, he had more in common with right wing Christian bigots than the majority of decent compassionate muslims who are impeccable in their tolerance of gays and other minorities. We even had the bizarre spectacle of ACLU Lawyers blaming the Christian right GOP for inspiring the attack.  Compare the left's refusal to accept Omar's self declared motivation with their zealous drive to purge all trace and memory of the Confederate States of America after Dylan Roof was pictured in the vicinity of a Confederate flag.  





And then, we had the piece de resitsance of narrative shift. It was reported that Omar had visited gay clubs in the past. He wasn't a muslim crazed to the point of murder by the blood soaked ideology of his faith. He was a poor homosexual grappling with his sexuality. He wasn't able to be true to himself because he grew up in a nasty right wing religious household (Boo!) where the father's harsh homophobic remarks were enough to make young Omar's life a living hell, driving him to the point of murderous madness. The problem isn't Islam. It is the lack of tolerance of gays among all religious groups. Problem solved. Move along. Nothing to see here.  The fact that no member of any other religion has ever actually gone out and murdered fifty gays is an inconvenient detail that can easily be brushed aside. 





One benefit of this whole sorry episode is that we now finally know who features higher in the liberal victim hierarchy and it is unequivocally muslims. Gays have been unceremoniously thrown under the bus. Better that the killer be thought to be a crazed closet homosexual than a devout muslim. Better that homosexuals lives should be put in real physical danger than that the left's plan to flood the west with muslims should be abated. The left do not care about the welfare of gays. Decadent openly homosexual lifestyles are simply not possible in countries with significant muslim populations. Gays will go back underground or they will suffer violence. They will get no help but lipservice from the left.  




We on the right knew that this would happen, and we know that it will happen again. We know that the easiest way to prevent a tiger from killing you is to not invite it into your living room. We care about our people, even the gay ones, and want to keep them safe from harm. We will not endanger them by rolling the dice on their futures with insane social experiments. Events such as Orlando were unknown in white Christian countries until we started letting the muslims in. We know what has changed and we know what the problem is. The best test of a hypothesis is its success at predicting future outcomes. Our hypothesis is sound. We will be proved right again and again and again.  The liberal narrative is collapsing so fast that it is hard to imagine that anyone but the most committed true believers has any faith in it anymore. Sooner or later, the gays, the feminists, and the multiculturalists will come running to the maligned hetero white man to protect them from the hell they have created and put things back to how the used to be. I only hope they do so before it is too late.





  
↧

The Jo Cox Murder & The Liberal Elite

June 18, 2016, 5:26 pm
$
0
0





The day after Jo Cox was murdered the high Queen of Britain's champagne socialist Left, Polly Toynbee, wrote in The Guardian that she lamented the rise of anti-politics and Right Wing populism. Her piece was called ''The mood is ugly, and an MP is dead'' and carried the by-line ''It’s wrong to view the killing of Jo Cox in isolation. Hate has been whipped up against the political class''

This attack on a public official cannot be viewed in isolation. It occurs against a backdrop of an ugly public mood in which we have been told to despise the political class, to distrust those who serve, to dehumanise those with whom we do not readily identify.
It’s been part of a noxious brew, with a dangerous anti-politics and anti-MP stereotypes fomented by leave and their media backers mixed in. Only an hour before this shooting Nigel Farage unveiled a huge poster showing Syrian refugees fleeing to Slovenia last year, nothing to do with EU free movement – and none arriving here. Leave’s poster read: “Breaking Point. We must break free from the EU and take control of our borders.” Nicola Sturgeon, Caroline Lucas and many others condemned it as “disgusting”, and so it is.
This is the poster in question:





Farage's poster depicts refugees as they actually are, and contrary to Toynbee's claims, they will all be able to move to Britain as soon as Angela Merkel grants them EU citizenship, so Farage is correct on that too. But the objective truth runs counter to the feel-good liberal narrative, the poster the liberal classes would like us to see is this:

And so within one single article Polly Toynbee has perfectly illustrated two points:

1. The liberal classes, media and political, have an agenda which is objectively false and they will vilify and attack anyone who disagrees and attempts to push a counter narrative.

2. The liberal classes are truly detested by a massive number of British people and they, the liberals, are unable to understand why.

It is this rift which led to the brutal murder of Jo Cox. To state it as boldly as that instantly invites accusations, especially on a blog such as this, of condoning murder, but to understand and explain something is not to condone it.

 The problem we face is that the liberal establishment are not just seen to be living in merely an ivory tower or bubble, but in a dark and sinister castle. The decrees and morality which they foist down onto the general population are not 'humanitarian' or in any sense morally justifiable, it is ill conceived lunacy at best, genocidal at worst.

 Jo Cox's career was largely based upon bringing refugees and immigrants into West Yorkshire, her constituency. To her and others of the liberal class there simply isn't any higher moral position than to advocate for a humanitarian stance which gets them a pat on the back from their peers, to look at the world and help the needy, relieve people of suffering and give shelter to the hungry feels just great. Being an 'internationalist' they would argue, allows one to get a larger sense of what is going on in the world and aligns one's priorities...etc.

And yet the day after she died the BBC reported a story from Jo's own West Yorkshire: 


  Peter Mann, head of the complex casework unit at the Crown Prosecution Service for Yorkshire and Humberside, said: "These men are responsible for a range of crimes involving child sexual exploitation and abuse.
"One victim was sexually assaulted in a car."The second victim was groomed, and systematically exploited by the older men she associated with. Some of her abusers acted together as a group, grooming her and plying her with drink and drugs. Others took advantage of her individually."
The main victim in the case was 13 years old when she was first abused.
Jo Cox's maiden speech in parliament:

Our communities have been deeply enhanced by immigration, be it of Irish Catholics across the constituency or of Muslims from Gujarat in India or from Pakistan, principally from Kashmir. While we celebrate our diversity, what surprises me time and time again as I travel around the constituency is that we are far more united and have far more in common with each other than things that divide us.
The gang rape of underage White girls is so commonplace in Jo Cox's own area that it took just one day between her murder and the conviction of a Muslim rape gang. And these liberals are utterly blind to it, they're pathologically incapable of even comprehending that their student union, John Lennon ethos is horrific in practice, idiotic in theory. Again, to understand is not to condone, but when Thomas Mair gave his name in court as ''Death to traitors'' this is surely what he was alluding to. 

Sitting in the comfort of his Dorset sea-view mansion, Leftist activist, Billy Bragg scored a super-hit on Twitter:
 The point he's making here is that the British tabloid press, The Dailies Mail and Express in particular, are indirectly, or directly culpable for Thomas Mair's radicalization because they report something approaching the truth regarding Islamic immigration. However, the difference is that these newspapers do not hold any political power, and despite having readerships many times greater than the liberal elites outlets, such as The Guardian, their readership is simply sidelined and ignored by the people with true power, and that would be the liberal elite.

 This takes us back to Polly Toynbee:


  Democracy is precious and precarious. It relies on a degree of respect for the opinions of others, soliciting support for political ideas without stirring up undue savagery and hatred against opponents. “Elites” are under attack in an anarchic way, when the “elite” justice minister can call on his supporters to ignore all experts.
Something close to a chilling culture war is breaking out in Britain, a divide deeper than I have ever known, as I listen to the anger aroused by this referendum campaign. The air is corrosive, it has been rendered so. One can register shock at what has happened, but not complete surprise.
The opinions of people who opposed the liberal Left ideal were silenced and increasingly, made illegal!.The liberal Left political and media class are no longer seen as humanitarians helping the oppressed, they are the oppressors.

  We have an entire upper stratum of British society which despise the lower stratum, they are the upper classes, the 'elite' and they have nothing but contempt, fear and disgust at the lower, White working class stratum, to the point that they view the mass rape of working class White girls by non Whites with complete indifference. Within this context Thomas Mair is the revolutionary fighting for freedom and the Left itself is the oppressor class holding the proles down in servitude. Left Wing thought is not pacific when dealing with power dynamics, when a Muslim is radicalized the Left point to Neo-Con interventions in the Middle East, when asked about Black crime statistics they invoke 'institutional racism' and the relative powerlessness of Black males. 

 Polly Toynbee's article is instructive because what she's describing is a new class of people, a new oppressed class which she and her ilk have created but they can't admit to because their insurmountable sense of moral superiority would be washed away.

 As Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn put it:

“They have forgotten, quite sincerely—they have entirely forgotten. How difficult it is to remember the evil one has done!”





↧

Brexit Special

June 22, 2016, 10:49 am
$
0
0






The British people stand on the cusp of giving the Globalist monster a serious poke in the eye. If the British people vote to leave the EU it will not destroy it, but it will mortally wound it as the EU desperately tries to contain nationalistic feeling arising within the subjugated people of Europe. Nationalists, conservatives, Alt-Righters and Far Rightists everywhere, after decades of defeat, will finally be able to say that we won something, not by any means the war, but at least a battle, and who knows, perhaps one day we shall look back and think of Brexit as the turning of the tide, of the beginning of the end of Globalism. 


 By extricating ourselves from the EU we do not solve all of our problems, but we do cut them down to a more manageable size, right now when we ask 'who is doing this to us' the mind whirls with labyrinthine plots and spaghetti-like bureaucracies operating down dark corridors far away, and, of course, myriad Jewish-led Think Tanks and lobby groups,  if we leave then we can simply point to our own ruling classes and more easily hold them to account.

 Our task as Nationalists outside the EU will be to needle and undermine the EU at every opportunity and to never miss a chance to give aid and support to our brothers and sisters on the continent in this great struggle. We must be like dogs against a bear, alone we don't stand a chance, but together we can wear it down, grind it away and exhaust it...and finally kill it.





Because the British referendum on the EU is an ongoing story this post will be unlike others posts in that it will be updated as more articles or insightful YouTube Videos or Tweets etc appear, this post will be 'live' for the next few days.

Majority Rights have an excellent set of analysis posts by Guessed Worker:

The politics and metapolitics of 24th June 2016

View to a kill

A test of political maturity

Also highly recommended is Greg Johnson's

Vetoing The Dream: The Case For Brexit

Millennial Woes has been doing a series of interviews and analysis


Red Ice Live - Matthew Tait: Brexit




Omniphi Media: Brexit, Should I Stay or Should I Go?




Shut It Down!

"Stop the populist suicide": Jewish lawyer calls for referendums to be prohibited by treaty

Nick Griffin writing for Occidental Observer:

The #StolenReferendum: How Cameron & Co have ruthlessly exploited the murder of MP Jo Cox to save their skins and the EU ‘Project’




What’s Missing from Brexit

Voting to Leave Europe Is the Most un-Jewish Thing You Can Do

Elizabeth Hurley backs Brexit:
Millenial Woes live with Dave Yorkshire:


The issue of polling stations providing pencils instead of pens is becoming a major talking point, here some sort of Asian mocks the concern of Brexiters using a common leftist 'trope'.
Johnny Collins - Leave Her Johnny (sea chantey)

BBC Brexit coverage LIVE

Victory!!!


Liberal politician Paddy Ashdown:

'' God help our country!!''


Liberals and non whites react with tolerance and respect for democracy:
Nigel Farage:

 “We have done it without having to fight, we have done it without a bullet being fired. Dare to dream that the dawn is breaking on an independent nation.” 
“This is a victory for ordinary people, for good people, for decent people,” he said. "The people who’ve “had enough of the merchant bankers.”


The British public on the BBC live feed:

Hardcore Marxist Feminist reacts to people standing up to Global Finance:

Loony Liberal has hilarious meltdown on hearing that the bigots and racists have won:

Brexit Wins! Globalists Lose! | United Kingdom's EU Referendum


More live chat and analysis with Millennial Woes and guests
Cameron resigns after defeat:
Donald Trump: Brexit is a 'great thing'
Daily Stormer on Cameron resignation:
VICTORY DAY: David Cameron Just Resigned!

CONGRATULATIONS, BRITAIN!
BBC EU Referendum Coverage Live Continued...
You Can't Stump the Trump Volume XXVII (You Can't Barrage the Farage)
↧
Search

The Child Soldiers Of The Khmer EU

June 25, 2016, 2:24 am
$
0
0
''You're standing on the wrong side of history!''








Remember the days when teenagers and youngsters were rebellious and stood up to authority? when they ''stuck it to the man'' and dreamed of creating a better world? well, that was in the 60's when they were brainwashed into tearing down the traditional Christian conservative order, those were the grandparents of the youngsters today who're sending Tweets such as this:



The histrionics  of the 'remain' losers is already the stuff of legend, there's no handshake and ''well played sir' there's no 'oh well, that's democracy' what we are seeing is borderline psychopathy as these spoiled, self entitled, narcissistic, effeminate drones throw, not just their toys out of the pram, but the pillows and sheets and milk bottle too.  

 This, quite frankly, sick behaviour, is the result of decades of insidious EU brainwashing and indoctrination being carefully placed within the education system and media. It's easy to see why a totalitarian system targets the young for indoctrination, they are, as Marxists would have it, an intellectual 'Blank Slate' filled with whatever doctrines and ideology their system desires. 

 Nowhere was this put into practice with more enthusiasm than in Pol Pot's Khmer Rouge, doctors, engineers, bankers and land owners were routinely rounded up by 12 year old girls and shot. The point was not to simply exterminate the bourgeoisie, but people who're old enough to remember another time, a time when 12 year old girls played with dolls and made flower arrangements instead of screaming orders while struggling to carry an AK47.
''I literally can't even right now!''

Thankfully the children of the Khmer EU don't have Soviet assault rifles, they have Twitter and Facebook instead, they've never had to come to terms with any threats to their intellectual indoctrination, it was simply their reality, what this grand triggering event has done is to activate their need to protect the system which has nurtured them, but it's too late, they've already lost, and the people who've taken it away from them are not just 'old people' there aren't enough, no, it's roofers from Essex called Dave, and factory workers from Bolton called Tracey. 

 Yesterday millions of Tracey's and Dave's logged onto their Facebook and Twitter and saw a remarkable thing, all of those metrosexual mop haired Uni grads who they viewed as 'a bit of a trendy liberal' had gone completely insane.

 It was working class Whites that did for the EU in Britain, not just the elderly, they were always factored in by the establishment. It was, as Peter Hitchens noted, the return and revenge of the group who've suffered most at the hands of the Globalists. Strictly speaking not everything which motivated them to turn out in such record numbers was directly related to the EU, Islamification for example, but what they did know is that the establishment cared a great deal for the EU and so they took it away from them. When working class Whites look upon the EU they think of the swarms of immigrant rapists waiting in Calais, suppressed wages and generally being sidelined and forgotten, even loathed.

 The tragedy of the children of the Khmer EU is that their world view is exactly what their masters want it to be, but they can't see it. To try and explain it to them is like trying to explain the nature of water to a fish. They howl against old people 'stealing their future' while peddling the world view and talking points of an 80 year old billionaire Jew, they screech that it's a victory for rich toffs while ignoring the fact that the EU is essentially a producer consumer slave farm created by and for High Finance, they whimper that the EU has brought peace and prosperity to Europe while Muslims rape and bomb their way across the continent and the Southern Europeans drown in debt and poverty.

 But what truly makes you wince is that they have the gall to accuse working class Whites and old people of ''Ignorance''.
   






↧
↧

Nothing Is Written...

June 28, 2016, 1:39 pm
$
0
0




As we bask in the aftermath of the seismic decision of the British public to leave the European Union, the shock-wave is still being felt by everyone, not just the general public, or the British political class which is in a state of collapse, or the pampered goons sitting in Brussels, but perhaps most of all it is we Nationalists who are still trying to wrap our heads around it all.

 The simple fact is the Globalists are never supposed to lose anything, and that mindset had infected Nationalists as much as the Globalists themselves, the trajectory of western civilization seemed always to point to a furthering of the liberal internationalist agenda, and with each passing year their plans came closer to fruition than the creation of a world in which we wanted to live . Nothing encapsulates this triumphalism, or despondency, depending on how look at it, as the phrase ''On the wrong side of history''. There was always another Zionist plot, another Jewish Think Tank, another gentile traitor, whatever the situation or the issue our side had become inured to losing...before the fight had even begun.


 And then Brexit happened.

 Thinking all of this over these last few days brought to mind one of my favourite films of all time, David Lean's masterful, Lawrence of Arabia, and the often used phrase within that film ''Nothing is Written...''. Lawrence, both the man in real life and in the film, was a classic 'Warrior-Poet' and had something of a Nietzschean 'Will to Power' ethos. When we are first introduced to lieutenant Lawrence in his barracks he's preforming a trick with a matchstick, he holds it between his fingers and lets the flame lap against his finger tips and tries to withstand the pain, when asked how he performs this 'trick' by another soldier he replies ''The trick, William Potter, is not minding that it hurts!''.

 Lawrence is constantly trying to overcome the limitations imposed on him by his own body and will, the question then becomes one of, what will such a mentality be capable of when the matchstick is swapped for war and the desert.

 The task given to Lawrence by his superiors is to tie down, disrupt,  destroy and generally wreak havoc upon the Turkish forces operating in the Arabian desert by using Arab fighting men granted to him by King Feisel. After some rumination Lawrence decides that the best course of action is to march 300 miles across the most scorching desert sands on earth and attack the Turk garrison at the port of Akaba, the Turk guns are facing the sea because, quite understandably, they'd deemed it incomprehensible that an attack from the desert could happen. 

 The Turks weren't alone, Lawrence's Arab cohort are astonished that anyone could be so foolish as to propose an 8 week! march through the Nefud, the simple minded and superstitious Arabs proclaim Lawrence to be a blasphemer, it would be against Allah, to which Lawrence replies with ''Nothing is written, except what is written in here'' tapping the side of his head. Still the Arabs remain  reluctant, it's suicide, it's never been done before, Lawrence points across the desert ''Akaba is that way, it's only a matter of going!''.

The point Lawrence is making here is that the man of superior will, an 'Over-man' is not dictated to by superstitions or trends, or his surroundings, such things are trivialities which breed weakness and must be overcome. When the small army sets off across the Nefud desert, one of the Arab peasants gets lost, his fellow Arabs decide to simply leave him for dead because it was Allah's will. Lawrence once again confounds his men by going back into the desert for a prolonged period to find the man, not for humanitarian reasons alone, Lawrence later shoots him for thievery and murder, Lawrence saves him because, as one of his awestruck comrades quips ''Truly, for some men nothing is written unless they write it''

Nothing is preordained, nobody is on the right or wrong side of history, history belongs to whomever has the superior will to make it do their bidding. It was not written that Britain would leave the EU Globalist plantation, and it isn't written that we shall forever be dominated by a Jewish owned media and political and banking class, it isn't written that White people will become minorities and eventually go extinct.  

 In Seven Pillars of Wisdom T.E Lawrence wrote:
''All men dream: but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity: but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible. This I did.''

 And so shall we, leaving the EU was a wonderful victory, but it is just holding a burning matchstick compared to what we must and shall do, as we write our own history....





↧

My Chat With Millennial Woes

July 1, 2016, 5:32 pm
$
0
0



My old comrade, Millennial Woes, finally succeeded in dragging me out the sanctuary of my blog and onto his popular YouTube channel, suitably fortified with lashings of strong English ale, I think we had a fair stab at putting the world in order....
↧

The Great Brexit Bait & Switch

July 5, 2016, 11:54 pm
$
0
0


They say that a week is a long time in politics, which makes two weeks a virtual eternity. Less than a fortnight ago the Great British public trudged down to the polls in their millions to answer a simple question; "Should the United Kingdom remain a member of the European Union or leave the European Union?". During the referendum campaign the entire political and media establishment joined forces to urge the British public to vote Remain, with warnings of dire consequences if they did not. The few public figures who dissented against this view were portrayed by the media as eccentrics, fruitcakes or closet racists. All of the opinion polls showed that Remain would win. But then the unthinkable happened. By a margin of 52% to 48% the British public voted to leave. The people rejoiced believing that the matter had been resolved once and for all. That Britain would leave the EU and then seek to negotiate new trading relationships throughout Europe and beyond



Sure, we'll give you a referendum on the EU

But it wouldn't be that easy. The political, media and financial elites have far too much invested in globalism to let it crumble without a fight. No sooner had the result been declared than the Remain camp (including virtually all of the mainstream media) began its campaign to resist the democratic will of the British people.  The media universally stated that Leave won by a mere 2%, when even the dimmest of schoolboys knows that the difference between 48% and 52% is 4% of the total vote and that 8.3% more people voted Leave than voted Remain.  This was a clear and decisive victory for Leave, not the "nothing in it, practically inconclusive" margin the Luegenpresse immediately tried to paint it as.

Then, a couple of hours after the result was announced we saw the resignation of David Cameron. A vanquished man nobly falling on his sword, or a cynical attempt to kick the whole issue of Brexit into the long grass for a few months while they worked on Plan B?  

Within 24 hours of the referendum result most mainstream media outlets were publishing bizarre stories about individuals who claimed to regret having voted Leave, despite there being absolutely no evidence that they had voted leave in the first place. I am not aware of stories of alleged post vote regret being published in relation to any previous public vote. The operation to soften up the public for establishment manipulation by discrediting the referendum result had begun. 

Now that they had tried to discredit the result, they could move on to phase two and seek to entirely subvert it. Jean Claude Juncker told us that Brexit voters were ignorant, uninformed, and should be overruled by parliament.  Similarly,  we had David Lammy MP brazenly suggesting that parliament should simply vote down the result of the referendum. Well, that's how democracy works in his ancestral homeland of Guyana anyway. Then we had the astroturf online petition and the street protests by assorted SJW weirdos, all laying the path for senior politicians to seriously discuss the possibility of a second referendum.The principle objective of this relentless media campaign was to lower the public's expectations that their voting to leave the European Union will actually result in Britain leaving the European Union and make them believe that some diluted, lesser, outcome may be an acceptable alternative. 


You didn't think we'd be bound by the outcome did you?

With public expectation suitably lowered, the real substance of the bait and switch manoeuvre could begin. Cameron's resignation took the invocation of Article 50 off the table for at least three months until a successor could be appointed. The current leader in the Tory leadership race, Theresa May, is both the Westminster establishment's and the EU's preferred candidate, She recently had a private meeting with leading anti Brexit campaigner Sir Richard Branson, who is a proponent of a second referendum. In a 2014 speech Theresa May described her views on the EU as follows:-

“These are the reasons I believe that the politicians who argue that we are better off in the EU, whatever the terms, are wrong,” she said. “But I also believe that the politicians who argue that we are better off out, whatever the terms, are also wrong.”

Clearly she is not so much a Eurosceptic as a Europragmatist or Euro fence sitter. It is difficult to imagine her fighting with blood and sinew to get us completely out of the EU, whatever the cost. She will most likely claim that her having been chosen by her party post referendum  gives her a mandate to handle the negotiations the way she promised her party she would. 

By PR manipulation and sleight of hand the outcome of the Brexit vote has been changed from a mandate for immediate withdrawal, which it clearly was having regard to to the wording of the referendum question, to a mandate to attempt to negotiate some form of changed relationship with the EU, whether as an associate member or as an independent entity bound by treaty to obey pretty well all of the EU's regulations, including freedom of movement, in exchange for the privilege of trading in their single market.  This article from the co-director of Open Europe sets out the range of options currently under consideration. If the British government stays on its current trajectory it is likely that we will land some way short of complete withdrawal from the EU. Our political class seem determined not to give full effect to the Brexit vote. 

Ironically, British withdrawal from the EU proper, whilst maintaining some form of associate status, may be the preferred option of the EU's greatest powers, France and Germany. Their decision  to publish proposals to turn the EU into a de facto United States of Europe complete with an army and tax raising powers within days of the Brexit vote shows that they clearly have no interest in wooing the UK back into the fold. The UK is the spanner in the works that has been holding back their superstate ambitions for decades. Despite the UK government's desperation not to leave the EU,  the EU seems to be quite glad to see the back of us. 









  
  


↧

Dylann Roof vs Black Lives Matter

July 9, 2016, 3:52 am
$
0
0







The Dallas shooting spree in which five White policemen were murdered by a Black man, Micah Xavier Johnson, comes almost exactly a year after a young White man, Dylann Roof, walked into a church and shot nine Black people. There's quite a lot of symmetry between the two men's motivations, Xavier carried out his mass shooting at a Black Lives Matter protest and ended telling the police '' “he was upset about the recent police shootings” and “wanted to kill white people, especially white officers,” Dylann Roof explained his motivation too ''You (Blacks) rape our women and are taking over our country''. So both men attacked 'The Other' because as they saw it their own group was under attack, their motivations are, objectively speaking, quite similar. 

 And so with that in mind we can expect to take a look at various media outlets and the manner and tone of those media outlets in reporting the murders committed by Roof and Johnson and reflect the similarity in motivation...can't we?


The Guardian opinion piece is by an African who laments:

He or she then continues...


''I am so tired.
I’m not just physically tired – although I can count the hours of sleep I’ve had the last two nights on one hand. I’m spiritually tired. My body and bones ache, my heart aches, my eyes blur, my brain is struggling to process the everyday while it processes the unavoidable.
 I, with so many of my black brothers and sisters, am on the long watch.
This time it began with the shooting of Alton Sterling. A man shot multiple times by police outside a store while selling CDs with permission of the store owner. Like many other black people, I try to avoid the videos showing the violent deaths of my brothers and sisters at the hands of the state, but it is so hard. There are so many videos, so much death.''


And so this person's first thoughts after the mass shooting of White people by Blacks, is with the well being of other Blacks. We can therefore expect that when The Guardian reported on the Dylann Roof murders the reporter first expressed sympathy for White women who've been raped by Blacks and Whites who've been marginalized by Non-Whites...except:
''The massacre in Charleston was not just an isolated hate crime carried out by a mentally ill racist in South Carolina. It is simultaneously representative and starkly indicative of the rampant racism structurally embedded in America, the responsibility for which, it might be argued, bears no exemption for any American, especially white Americans, north or south, republican or democrat. 

...That cloak of righteousness shields white America from having to face its contemporary prejudices and the historical biases from which they are a result. This cloak of invisibility also inhibits white America’s moral and psychological capacity to acknowledge and understand the magnitude of those historical and contemporary prejudices, and the effects they have on our society.


The Charleston shooting was not an anomaly, but a manifestation of the violence cultivated in America towards black communities. The shooter, Roof, is a product of a system that has been breeding hatred and bigotry in America since the first Africans were kidnapped and forcibly transported here in the 15th century as slaves under deplorable, inhumane conditions.''


Meanwhile in The Independent 'Wail Qasim'wails:
 ''It’s a profound sentiment today: it was not the protesters marching for an end to state violence against black citizens who shot Dallas police officers, and it would be unjust to imply that is the case.

Many will be shocked and saddened by the death of these officers, especially police working across the US. This will be a time of grief for the whole city of Dallas, too. Yet already the black community across America is grieving this week.


The shootings of Alton Sterling in Baton Rouge and Philando Castile in Minnesota – only a day apart – have reignited calls to address that black people are being killed by law enforcement at an alarming rate. It was these killings that sparked the protest in Dallas. Sterling and Castile’s deaths reminded America that, nearly two years after Ferguson, little seems to have changed. That remains true even after today’s events.''


Qasim dedicates precisely one sentence! to the shot White policemen before pushing the Black Lives Matter narrative. So how did The Independent report on Roof? did they throw out a few words on the dead Blacks and then continue to rail against the rape of White women and working class Whites becoming marginalized? of course not, the writer tediously drags out the 'White murderers are terrorists' meme for an entire article:
''...Yet still the West allows white people to keep flowing into our countries. Surely the time has come to say enough is enough, and if we’re to protect the right of citizens to go innocently to church, we must eliminate these breeding grounds of white terror, by sending drones to bomb white countries such as Finland and Andorra.

Some so-called ‘‘moderate’’ white people might say Dylann Roof was not representative of all whites, but we need to ask why they’re not doing more to integrate the terrorists into civilised black ways. Universities such as Harvard or Yale, where most students are white and therefore susceptible to the radicals’ message, should stop teaching yachting and rowing, and make everyone play basketball on a court with potholes, in a block where police sirens never stop wailing.''


The Guardian and The Independent are 'respectable' Left leaning MSM outlets, let us brace ourselves as we delve into the Neo-Marxist swamp of Salon, which actually makes The Guardian look like The Occidental Observer.

 A Black man who ''just wants to kill White people'' because of perceived oppression  goes out and does just that and Salon reacts with:

A White man who kills Blacks because of the 'perceived' brutalities inflicted on Whites, particularly White women, at the hands of Blacks goes out and kills Blacks and Salon reacts with: 

The Huffington Post has decided to riff on the ''Don't blame Black Lives Matter'' vibe but when one takes a closer look at the double standards and hypocrisy the news outlet seems like a sick demented farce:

''...This (I want to kill Whites) statement will undoubtedly add fuel to the fire, and racist America will insist that the horrid actions of one shooter is reflective of an entire race, or in this case, a movement that aims to protect an entire race. But the only thing that this tragedy proves, once again, is that one angry person with easy access to guns can incite horror. Public mass shootings in this country are overwhelmingly committed by white men, and yet, have you ever heard someone blame the entire white race for one white person’s crimes?''

The Black author of this article asks us a question ''have you ever heard someone blame the entire white race for one white person’s crimes?''in actual fact yes, an example can be found just two paragraphs above on this very article, but what's worse is that The Huffington Post, the very same news outlet this moron writes for, carried an article after the Dylann Roof murders called:

''White folks created white supremacy which is perhaps the greatest evil of our time, then out of greed and fear proceeded to openly support it by pretending it’s not there. And it is exactly that profound neglect of us not addressing white supremacy as to why people of color are still being lynched and receiving social, psychological, economical and institutional injustice and inequality. As white folks we have to realize that we need to address this for our interest as well. 

The cost to all involved is enormous. We will never be a peaceful or functional society living out lies. Everything has a way of coming back full circle and realistically how much longer do you think our society can tolerate this great evil called white supremacy? Isn’t it about time as white folks we stop being racially selfish and lazy and stand up and do something about it? Remember Ignorance is bliss until it bites you in the ass.

Today in 2015 we have blatant modern-day lynchings of black and brown folks being executed by our white biased/racist law enforcement. We have a white supremacist terrorist who killed nine innocent souls while black churches are still burning. Today we disproportionately lock up people of color in the world’s largest mass incarceration complex while some white folks can be seen proudly waving their Confederate symbols of white supremacy all over our nation. In 2015, all of our American institutions are still operating under a structure and system of white supremacy. All this while we continue to be programmed by our highly whitewashed media and educational system.''

The author then provides Whites with a six point plan to absolve themselves of their White Supremacy, here are a few:


1. Acknowledgement/Acceptance of racial reality. To find the moral courage and truth by letting go of our greed and fear that keeps us irrationally clinging to the dominant position, privileges and benefits that white supremacy has given us. So that we may put behind us our years of cultural white supremacist conditioning, thoughts, and values by facing the very hard and uncomfortable truth racially about our self, our race, our culture and our country.
3. To listen, learn, and believe what people of color are saying about their life in America. They are our teachers racially.
6. To pass it on by telling, teaching, and sharing your new racially unbiased truth and reality, with all children (and start them early), with your white friends, family and co-workers, with everyone and every place. Work to decolonize the minds and hearts of all, especially our nation’s institutions


This retard is using the media to push the narrative that White people are programmed by the media into being White Supremacists. This is the real issue here and as we can see, all we have to do is compare how the media have reported on the murders of two men with superficially similar motives. The idea of Black oppression and White Supremacy is utterly absurd when the motives for Dylann Roof's murders are not even discussed because to do so would be racist and oppressive to Blacks.

 If there is a pro-White media indoctrinating Whites then where is it? it obviously isn't The Huffington Post where the Jew, Jesse Benn, can actually write an article called:

And now Jesse has his wish, and mustering all the empathy a Jew can possibly have for White people, Benn reacted to the murder of White cops with:
The narrative double standards, the paradoxes and mental leaps and back-flips needed to believe and internalize what we are told by the media regarding 'Black Oppression'' and 'White Supremacy' are so nonsensical that it's simply incoherent unless you bring in a third group, a group which wants to wound Whites, a group which is literally using Blacks to wound Whites, and their primary means of doing this is the media, their media.....







↧
↧

Anyone for Christian Ethics?

July 12, 2016, 10:20 pm
$
0
0





Written by geebee36-6.







It is axiomatic that the rise of what is known as the ‘Alt-Right’ coincides with the increasing numbers of people in what are the traditional White Lands, who are immensely unhappy about what has become of them. It is also the result of a Great Awakening among the indigenous populations of those lands. While any summary of the nature of this unhappiness risks stating the obvious, there are angles to the overall situation which I believe require a greater awareness. The perceived problems, their origins, and the way forward in terms of addressing them, are worthy subjects for examination, if for no other reason than to provide an Aide Memoire. I shall therefore deal with these matters, in the hope that I might shed some light on them.


On any Alt-Right blog it will be uncontroversial to note that white people – what some would term the White Race – stand on the brink of the abyss. That they stand there largely owing to malign influences that wish to see them topple headlong into it. That those influences might be described as inspired and led by Jewry. And that the great majority of white people today have been brainwashed into not only accepting, but actively collaborating in their own demise.
We are depressed, if not entirely surprised, when we hear European Commissioners opine that “Immigration is a moral necessity”. When the German Chancellor announces that “Islam is welcome.” When a French President predicts that "Arabic is the language of the future". When a Pakistani Muslim becomes Mayor of London. When it becomes clear that the EU ruling elite is not merely welcoming, but actively soliciting an Islamic invasion, that will succeed where it previously failed at Tours, Lepanto and Vienna. When Europeans who wish to assert their own ethnic identity and interests are condemned as ‘far-right racists’ who are ‘fueling hate’.

We look across the Atlantic, and we see a country seemingly hell bent on self-destruction, through its foolish naïveté concerning human nature and the world itself. Its mulatto President – ‘the leader of the free world’ – is content to see its wealth redistributed to the African-American “community”, and avers that the root of all its manifold ills may be found in ‘white privilege’ and ‘racism’. The Republican candidate for the forthcoming Presidential election is reviled and castigated by his own party for suggesting that it might be wise to implement strategies for preventing Islamic terrorism, and for limiting immigration from people who are likely to represent a net burden on its economy. The ruling American elite has so far lost its connection with sanity that “minorities” will soon make up more than half of its population.

We ask, when we consider these things, why it is widely believed to be not merely unreasonable, but ‘hateful’, merely to want to preserve our own ethnicity and culture, just as all other peoples do. We ask, but in truth we already know the answer to our question: two generations of Westerners have been so effectively brainwashed that the majority of whites today, and especially the young, celebrate “diversity” (which is to say their own peoples’ forthcoming extinction) as their core value.

So much for the problem. But what should we call it? And what are its origins? As to the first part, it is known by many names. Progressivism, Cultural Marxism, Left Liberalism, Secular Universalism, Political Correctness. Let us call it Left Liberal Progressivism, or LLP for short. As to its origins, I shall adopt what I realise will be in many quarters a controversial paradigm. Never the less, I am utterly convinced of its veracity. Let us first work backwards in stages.

Since WWII the agenda for White extinction has been promoted and implemented with ever increasing vigour by almost all mainstream politicians; it is beyond doubt that they came to this position owing to Jewish influence. Prior to WWII, we might ‘finger’ the so-called Frankfurt School (an entirely Jewish phenomenon) and its ‘Critical Theory’ approach to culture and civilisation. In the nineteenth-century, Liberalism, and its antecedent Radicalism, ratified in law the core principles of freedom and equality (without which LLP cannot function), starting with the Great Reform Act of 1832.  In the late seventeenth- and the eighteenth-centuries, the Enlightenment saw the rise of those same principles, promoted by influential thinkers and writers, especially Locke, Rousseau and Voltaire. It would lead to two great revolutions, first in Britain’s American colonies in 1776, and even more climactically in France 13 years later. In the sixteenth-century, the Reformation led to a renewed fracturing of the Christian Church after 500 years, and its result was the disastrous religious wars, especially the Thirty Years’ War, in Europe and beyond. The English Civil War of 1642-51 was among the most important of these, pitting Catholic against Protestant and King against Parliament, and culminating in the execution of Charles I. Out of this arose the concepts of popular sovereignty, an extended voting suffrage, religious tolerance and equality before the law. After the Restoration, when the Stuart monarchy returned to rule in 1660 with Charles I’s son Charles II as king, the Glorious Revolution of 1688 saw James II exiled, and the system of constitutional monarchy installed.

Before these events, the Roman Catholic Church had kept the lid on the explosive and revolutionary nature of the Christian gospels for over a thousand years, by the simple expedient of banning any translation into local languages from the Latin texts on theoretical pain of death. The Reformation arguably owed its origins, in part at least, to the scriptures becoming available in German and English [1], so that ordinary people could read their dangerous message of the equality of all men before god. Indeed it is very the nature of the gospels themselves which compels us to consider them as being the source of our ills; to identify Christianity itself, in fact, as nothing less than the First Cause of our present woes.


Sacred and Profane: Adoptive Christian Ethics 


In Season 1 of the popular American T.V. series Breaking Bad, Walter White agonises over how to deal with his prisoner ‘Krazy 8’, whom he has tied up in the basement, having earlier unsuccessfully tried to gas him in order to avoid being killed himself. He writes a list of pros and cons, helping him decide whether to kill him or not. On the ‘Against’ side, he writes that it would be ‘contrary to our Judaeo-Christian values’. On the ‘For’ side, he writes that if he lets him go, Krazy 8 will kill Walter and all his family. He eventually strangles Krazy 8, but only because he discovers the necessity of the latter option in time: Krazy 8 has managed to conceal a weapon with which he plans to kill Walter. What would a true Christian have done? That scene, in its way, is a metaphor wherein the capacity for Christian ethics to destroy itself, in the name of ‘saving’ others who might ultimately do them harm, is graphically exposed.

What might surprise many, however, is that modern LLP philosophy derives more or less intact from Christianity, and more especially from Christian ethics. As blogger ‘Conservative Swede’ wrote: ‘We are witnessing the historical demise of Christianity. When a star dies, in its last phase it expands into a red giant, before it shrinks into a white dwarf. Liberalism is the red giant of Christianity. And just as a red giant, it is devoid of a core; it expands a thousand-fold, but it is losing its substance and is about to die.’ 

While the various Christian churches are all on board this train to perdition, it is in the modern, secular manifestation of Christian ethics noted above, whereby the traditional faith has been stripped of God and Jesus, that we see its most ruthless and efficient destructive power. In its older, sacred form, it is a given that man is a fallen, wretched creature, whose sins are redeemed by the sacrifice on the cross. In effect, his shortcomings are topped up free of charge by Jesus’ sacrifice. Within the Secular Church of Protestant Christianity (as we might term LLP political philosophy), however, no such redeemer figure is at hand. It therefore falls to the individual to make good those shortfalls himself, and in whatever way possible. Too often this means sacrificing his own interests and people in order to implement policy consistent with Christian ethics. Little wonder that elevating others’ ‘suffering’ above their own is seen as an ideal way of signalling their virtue to others of the ‘in group’, who have, in effect, usurped the judgement seat formerly occupied by the Christian deity. 

Thus ‘Pathological Altruism’ is the order of the day. And since people of the Third World must be equal to us in every way (not only in accordance with Boasian anthropology, but also through the originally Christian notion of Universalism - the idea that all are eligible to be saved), the fact that they fall behind and are disadvantaged can have nothing to do with any inherent or innate shortfalls in terms of their own human capital. Rather it must be our fault, and blame must be laid at the door of ‘white privilege’ and ‘racism’.

As for that part of Christianity that remains sacred, unlike many of his predecessors, the present Pope is totally on-message regarding Christian ethics, and is thus an abject menace. He wishes to see as many brown people as possible swarm into our lands, in order that we all make sacrifices and do our Christian duty. In the Church’s case, of course, this same idea is driven by eschatological considerations: this earthly life counts for little, and we must look instead to the eternal. Well I’m sorry, but many of us understand full well that the eternal is just another bit of propaganda, and especially so with regard to the stick element, rather than the carrot. The doctrine of eternal damnation is surely the most pernicious notion in all the long annals of human history. It is salutary to consider that few today really understand what it was like to live under that system and that threat; to dwell among Christians who taught that although the soul was spirit in nature, it could still experience the physical pain and suffering of eternal hell-fire. The mental anguish and fear this must have caused, in the days before the Church decided to soft-pedal that particular element of faith, can scarcely be imagined. As for the carrot part, I think that Adolf Hitler was onto something when he wryly observed that here on earth we could listen to the music of Richard Wagner, while after death we could only look forward to the endless strumming of harps![2]

He, in fact, was one of the first to recognise the link between Christian ethics and the potentially destructive elements of secular liberal political philosophies. He remarked that: ‘The heaviest blow that ever struck humanity was the coming of Christianity. Bolshevism is Christianity’s illegitimate child. Both are inventions of the Jew. The deliberate lie in the matter of religion was introduced into the world by Christianity. Bolshevism practices a lie of the same nature, when it claims to bring liberty to men, whereas in reality it seeks only to enslave them. In the ancient world, the relations between men and gods were founded on an instinctive respect. It was a world enlightened by the idea of tolerance. Christianity was the first creed in the world to exterminate its adversaries in the name of love. Its key-note is intolerance.’ [3]

He went on to add to this in a most interesting vein when, on 21st October 1941, while at dinner at Obersalzberg, he remarked to his guests: ‘The decisive falsification of Jesus’ doctrine was the work of St. Paul. He gave himself to this work with subtlety and for purposes of personal exploitation…On the road to Damascus, St. Paul discovered that he could succeed in ruining the Roman State by causing the principle to triumph of the equality of all men before a single God—and by putting beyond the reach of the laws his private notions, which he alleged to be divinely inspired. If, into the bargain, one succeeded in imposing one man as the representative on earth of the only God, that man would possess boundless power…St. Paul knew how to exploit this state of affairs in order to conduct his struggle against the Roman State. Nothing has changed; the method has remained sound.’

He went on to say that St. Paul was the first man to take account of the possible advantages of using a religion as a means of propaganda. If the Jew succeeded in destroying the Roman Empire, it was because St. Paul transformed a local movement of Aryan opposition into a supra-temporal religion, which postulates the equality of all men amongst themselves, and their obedience to an only god. 

Hitler continued: ‘It’s striking to observe that Christian ideas, despite all St. Paul’s efforts, had no success in Athens. The philosophy of the Greeks was so much superior to this poverty-stricken rubbish that the Athenians burst out laughing when they listened to the apostle’s teaching. But in Rome St. Paul found the ground prepared for him. His egalitarian theories had what was needed to win over a mass composed of innumerable uprooted people. Whilst Roman society proved hostile to the new doctrine, Christianity in its pure state stirred the population to revolt. Rome was Bolshevised, and Bolshevism produced exactly the same results in Rome as later in Russia. Yesterday, the instigator was Saul: the instigator to-day, Mardochai. Saul has changed into St. Paul, and Mardochai into Karl Marx.’[2]
It is indeed striking that the Athenians wanted nothing to do with Saul of Tarsus, who was clearly embarrassed and belittled by those mighty intellects. So much so that he aimed a petty barb at them in 1 Corinthians 1:19: ‘: “I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and the discernment of the discerning I will thwart.”  That he succeeded mightily in this endeavour should afford us little comfort today: a thousand years of Catholic suppression of ‘the wisdom of the wise’ would follow Constantine’s adoption of Saul’s proto-Bolshevism in the early fourth-century.

What is it that makes Christianity ultimately so dangerous to us today? It is Christian ethics, with its exhortations to ‘love one another’, to ‘turn the other cheek’, to ‘love the sinner’, and its belief that ‘the last shall be first and the first shall be last’, and that ‘the meek will inherit the earth’. These preposterous notions undergird a formula whose practical result is to punish success and to reward failure – exactly as with socialism. Christianity thus promotes the absurd idea of equality; one that is rooted nowhere in nature, and which is thus contrary to nature. Indeed, as Alexis de Tocqueville observed more than 150 years ago: “The desire for equality becomes more and more insatiable as equality increases.” Without this debilitating and corrupt lie, there would have been no Enlightenment, no religious wars, and none of the barbarism and brutality that followed, whereby Christian society set about the business of ‘exterminating its adversaries in the name of love’. 

Hierarchy is the natural condition of human societies, and has been so since the beginning of civilisation. The modern notion of equality is the natural enemy not only of quality, but of the societal recognition and acceptance of quality that hierarchy presupposes. Thus the worship of equality, just like Saul’s teaching, is that of a false god. It is ultimately aimed at the simple, the gullible and the feeble. It is the enemy of advancement and true progress, and sounds the death knell of all societies that bow down before its malodorous feet.

We who are aware of these things constitute just the latest of those adversaries so lovingly targeted for extermination by means of Christian ethics. Because of its entrenched doctrine of Universalism, the whole of Christian ethics, in both its original sacred and in its modern secular forms, is race-neutral. It is therefore impossible to make any headway in terms of race without first jettisoning Saul of Tarsus’ Jewish propaganda, as Hitler and the National Socialists did. Only by doing so, and by rediscovering the true glory and origins of Western thought and civilisation, which is firmly fixed in Graeco-Roman purity and nobility, might we make any significant headway. 

The ‘Jewish Problem’


In The Culture of Critique, Professor Kevin MacDonald advances a powerful thesis. That Jewish influence, especially by means of certain twentieth-century intellectual movements, designed consciously or unconsciously to advance Jewish interests, changed European societies in fundamental ways. As Stanley Hornbeck noted in his review of MacDonald’s work: ‘These movements were presented as universalistic and even utopian, but the increasing dominance of their ideas has had profound political and social consequences that benefited Jews, but caused great harm to Gentile societies. [MacDonald’s] analysis, which he makes with considerable force, is an unusual indictment of a people generally thought to be more sinned against than sinning’.

Perhaps the best known of these twentieth-century intellectual movements is the so-called ‘Frankfurt School’ previously mentioned. In its original manifestation it was known as the Frankfurt Institute of Social Research, founded during the Weimar period by Jewish Marxist millionaire Carl Grünberg. Once the NSDAP came to power, most of its members de-camped to the United States, where it coalesced around the University of California at Berkeley. It was headed by Max Horkheimer, and other influential members were Theodor Adorno, Erich Fromm, Otto Kirchheimer and Herbert Marcuse, all of them Jews, with a strong sense of Jewish identity. Horkheimer made no secret of the nature of the institute's activities, writing that: ‘[Our] research would be able to transform itself directly into propaganda.’

MacDonald claimed that In order to open European-derived societies to the immigration that would transform them, a core aim of organised Jewry, it was first necessary to discredit racial solidarity and commitment to tradition. He cites Adorno’s The Authoritarian Personality and Anti-Semitism and Emotional Disorder as works promoted and funded by the American Jewish Committee, and taken up with enthusiasm by Jewish academics. Their message was that all group affiliations were a sign of mental disorder. Loyalty to religion, family and especially to race were signs of a dangerous and defective "authoritarian personality." Because drawing distinctions between different groups is illegitimate, all group loyalties - even close family ties - were "prejudice." Christopher Lasch thought that they led to the conclusion that prejudice "could be eradicated only by subjecting the American people to what amounted to collective psychotherapy -- by treating them as inmates of an insane asylum." 

But according to MacDonald, what Horkheimer and Adorno considered as mental illness in gentiles was precisely what Jewish identity was built upon. Or in other words, the Frankfurt school postulated the notion that behaviour central to Jewish identity should be conceptualized as pathological in gentiles. They concluded that Christian self-denial and especially sexual repression caused hatred of Jews, and that anti-Semitism was of itself a sign of mental illness.

In addition to ridiculing patriotism and racial identity, the Frankfurt school glorified promiscuity and sexual perversion, including homosexuality. MacDonald felt that: ‘"Certainly many of the central attitudes of the largely successful 1960s countercultural revolution find expression in The Authoritarian Personality, including idealizing rebellion against parents, low-investment sexual relationships, and scorn for upward social mobility, social status, family pride, the Christian religion, and patriotism.’ 

The very existence of this Jewish Problem, however, derives from Christianity’s nature. It is a foreign, Levantine religion, which irrevocably establishes Jews and Judaism at its heart, and espouses Saul’s bogus ethical code. As Cesar Tort observed: ‘the Jewish Problem can only be understood as the consequence of a deranged altruism resulting from the secular fulfilment of universal Christian values’. Secular fulfilment, note: LLP philosophy in all its fully blown pomp.
There is an entire essay to be written concerning Jewish influence on the American involvement in, and its prosecution of, the Second World War. Space precludes any detailed examination of this subject here. Suffice it to say that the dystopian, shallow, deracinated world we are now condemned to inhabit was brought about by the defeat of what might be thought of as Europe’s one chance of true salvation from these malign, parasitic influences crouching on its back. To that brief flowering we might give the name German Ethical Socialism. It was eradicated with a brutality on the part of the Allies never before seen in any war waged by the white race. Indeed it was as if it the foe being crushed were scarcely human, yet all the while, the Allied propaganda machine spewed out tales of ‘German brutality’. Allied war aims, as then claimed, fall away and are revealed as the flimsy propaganda they are, when viewed objectively. The real cause of American manoeuvring to wage war on Germany (which Roosevelt began in October 1937, long before any ‘aggression’ on the part of the Third Reich) lay with the fact that it posed a mortal threat to that monster with a Jewish head and an American body that now bestrides the world. ‘Judea Declares War on Germany’ ran the headlines of the New York Times in 1933. No, that’s not a typo: 1933. That year Hitler came to power, and had had the temerity to establish his own sound currency, and thus cut his people free from the Jewish system of usury that had brought the price of a loaf of bread in Weimar Germany to half a million Deutschmarks. That was his real crime: to threaten Jewish financial power.

In this post-war world, Jewish-American Big Business culture stands triumphant, and Homo economicus, the wretched creature it has brought into being to serve its ends, crawls abjectly in its loathsome shadow. As for European political power, it ceased to exist in any meaningful sense in 1945.


Democracy - The Greatest Scam of All


It is no use deluding ourselves that our present system of governance, which is to say liberal democracy via universal enfranchisement, offers any meaningful solution. I first came to my current political philosophy via the movement emerging some ten years ago, known as Neo-Reaction. It is part of the so-called ‘Dark Enlightenment’, and among its ‘Grand Sith Lords’ was a blogger calling himself Mencius Moldbug. In real life he is Curtis Yarvin, a young Jewish computer programmer from California. Although he is, unsurprisingly, not on board with the Jewish Question, he is incredibly clever and well informed for one so young. He certainly enlightened me as to four key points, the first of which was the theme I have already outlined, by which modern LLP philosophy is really a secularised form of Protestant Christianity, retaining most of the latter’s core ethical structure. The other three were the inherently destructive nature of democracy, the tendency of the political zeitgeist to move inexorably leftwards, and the existence of a matrix of power, far more potent than, and acting independently of actual politics. This last he calls ‘the Cathedral’. It comprises the entire academic establishment, the media-entertainment complex, the apparatus of justice and law enforcement, several large NGOs and international charities, the trans-national political organisations, such as NATO, The UN and the EU, and last but not least, the literal cathedrals themselves; the Protestant and Catholic Churches. ‘The Cathedral’ performs the role of ‘manufacturing consent’ for its projects and agenda among the people; or to employ a rather plainer term, ‘brainwashing’. 

The crucial fact is that, as Moldbug put it, ‘politicians live downstream of the Cathedral’. In other words, the Cathedral, having manufactured consent, then enforces its agenda as policy, and the politicians can do or say nothing that has not been given the Cathedral’s imprimatur. To do so would mean instant career suicide. Thus, thanks to the Christian ethics driving ‘Cathedral’ policy, we dwell in a political climate where professional politicians must kow-tow to ‘the zeitgeist’ so dictated by ‘the Cathedral’. It need scarcely be pointed out that one effect of this is that any meaningful discussion of race and immigration is, quite simply, off limits. Moreover, ‘the Cathedral’ is winning its battles to enforce its agenda by placing any questioning of it, much less any challenge, under the sanction of law.
As the Cathedral moves leftwards, professional politicians of the left wing ‘legacy parties’ happily follow. Conservative politicians, however, can only survive by also moving in step with the ever leftward zeitgeist, albeit at a respectable distance of about a decade. Thus today’s ‘conservative’ is indistinguishable from the left wing politician of the first years of the 21st-century. Conversely, left-wingers from the 1980s appear to be ‘far-right’ by today’s standards. 

When I first read of Moldbug’s rationalisation as to how and why LLP philosophy was actually Protestant Christianity without God, I was amazed. It seemed incredible, but after studying and thinking I began to see that it was a sound analysis. I Later found that Cesar Tort was saying exactly the same, and at around the same time (2007-8), but I didn’t know of his blog’s existence until recently. 

Taken together, the four key elements of Moldbug and Tort’s thinking lead, by relentless logic, into two stark conclusions: that neither democracy nor Christianity are our friends. Democracy is in fact a cancer that dictates that politicians are not merely disinclined, but effectively forbidden from serving the best interests of their country. Because their sole concern is obtaining power, which can only be achieved through attracting votes from an electorate largely brainwashed by ‘the Cathedral’, they are severely limited to parroting its Progressive mantra. Thus, if the Cathedral dictates that immigration is essential, then immigration is what politicians of whatever stripe will deliver. Good governance thus flies out of the window, and is replaced by policies tailor made to expedite our demise. Our much vaunted Democracy is, as British philosopher Nick Land observed, not merely doomed, but rather it is doom itself. Perhaps an even better summation was provided by Francis Parker Yockey, who in 1939 described democracy as “the corruptibility of the government by private wealth”. Democracy is rightly condemned by history as being ‘the graveyard of civilisations’.

There are no prizes for guessing which minority component of European and American society holds sway within ‘the Cathedral’. But although the old quip ‘is the Pope a Catholic?’ is popular, it is becoming less than entirely certain that it is literally true. Because the Cathedral is both Jew-dominated, yet espouses Christian ethics, it has become impossible to separate the Progressive left hegemony from the Christian religion itself. The Pope is overtly pursuing policies favoured and promoted by the Jews, including mass immigration from Muslims. These policies are deliberately aimed at ending the hegemony of the White races, in order that Jews might not only ‘avoid another holocaust’, but continue to run the show for their own profitable ends.

It was always going to end this way of course. Christianity might be likened to the HIV virus; it opens up Western civilisation to attack. Essentially, HIV was contracted by Western civilisation in the early fourth-century, when we abandoned the Glories of our Graeco-Roman heritage. It then lay dormant until full blown AIDS presented in the wake of the Protestant Reformation, and its offshoots Liberalism and Progressivism. With AIDS in control, it merely remained for other fatal infections to take hold. Jewry came first, in the late nineteenth-century. More recently we have contracted a tertiary infection called Islam. Unable to repel its attack, as we successfully did on previous occasions, we are now at its mercy.

So this is where we are. In effect, the whole of Western polity can be likened to a train called ‘Christian Ethics’, built and maintained by Jews, and speeding along a track towards a carefully planned disaster. Progressives are blind to all risk, and are actually urging the driver to increase speed. So–called conservatives are on the same train, but despite being vaguely aware that disaster awaits, they are content merely to try and touch the brakes a little from time to time. But here is the strangest part: those on the Alt-Right, including many White Nationalists, recognise full well the disaster that lies ahead, and have jumped off the train. But they are still walking along the track in the same direction!

It is perhaps mildly ironic to finish by quoting Milton; a mighty force of the Enlightenment and a passionate advocate for freedom. Furthermore, in invoking his great dramatic poem Paradise Lost, we may indulge ourselves in a little mischief at Christianity’s expense; its subject consisting entirely in that element of eschatology we should most revile.  We who now stand on the brink of the abyss might well empathise with the situation of the fallen Arch-Angel Satan. Cast down from Paradise, he finds himself instead the ruler of Hell. Is he downhearted? Yes. Does he give up? Certainly not. As Milton wrote:  

‘Into this wild abyss the wary fiend stood on the brink of Hell and looked a while, pondering his voyage; for no narrow frith he had to cross.’ 

We might surely take some inspiration from Satan’s words, on first realising the implications of his fall, and his new circumstances:

'Farewell happy Fields, where Joy for ever dwells: Hail horrors! Hail Infernal world! And thou Profoundest Hell, Receive thy new Possessor: One who brings a mind not to be chang’d by Place or Time. The mind is its own place, and in itself can make a Heav’n of Hell, a Hell of Heav’n.’


[1] In Germany, Martin Luther had issued his translation of the New Testament in 1622, and the Old in 1634. William Tyndale is often credited with producing the first English version of the bible in the early sixteenth-century, although John Wycliffe had done so two hundred years earlier. This, of course, was before the age of printing, and circulation of the text was severely restricted. Earlier translations in English vernacular existed, notably those of Bede (670-735).

[2] Mein Kampf

[3] Table Talk, 1941.
↧

No Country For Nice White Families

July 16, 2016, 12:48 am
$
0
0






Browsing Twitter after the latest  non-White slaughter of White people has become depressingly mundane, this time we prayed for Nice, this time last week we prayed for Dallas, where we pray for next week is down to the coloured people, it always is these days. Richard Spencer posted a graphic video of the dead bodies in Nice before the French police wrapped them in blankets and those strangely futuristic tinfoil style body bags. What interested me was the manner in which the victims, particularly the men, were dressed. To be blunt about it, will Europeans become subjugated, slaughtered and raped out of existence while attired in Nike flipflops and matching chino shorts and polo T-shirt combo?


It's perfectly understandable that a White man expects to be able to walk down the promenade with his woman and his child to enjoy the national holiday, the fireworks and the sense of patriotism which goes with that and not expect to see his family run down or shot, that he can walk with his family unarmed and unprepared for any kind of aggression against himself or his loved ones. He takes it for granted, he might argue it is his ''Right'' to do so.

 But when was such a Right ever given or promised?

We've seen something similar in Sweden recently, young Swedish women expected to be able to attend music festivals in high summer dressed in tight shorts and T shirts, blond hair flowing, sweating and slightly drunk, they expected to be able to have a ''good time''' without ever being raped or groped and aggressively fondled. They too would argue that it is their Right to be allowed this freedom, and again the question should be asked...

But when was such a Right ever given or promised?

A life of safety and security is not a given, it has to be earned. When a Frenchman sits down to sip a glass of wine and gaze adoringly upon his family as they watch the fireworks he's enjoying the fruits of centuries of struggle against the races of the world, and even the nature of life. He belongs to a breed of man that overcame the odds, faced the struggle and conquered the forces aligned against him. Today's European has never really struggled for anything or against anything and he expects the brown and black forces of chaos to remain in their Third World slum, if he only likes the right pages on Facebook and pretends to agree with the fast talking liberal on television, then all will be well. 
You Get This For Free


 Our enemies think of White people living lives disconnected from struggle and hardship as ''White Privilege'' the problem with White Privilege theory is not that we have it, but that we do not have it. 

 The argument could be made that the Swedish people are incapable of struggling against the rising tide of colour because, living in their rather isolated and wintry wonderland, they've become too ''altruistic''. Similarly, there's a fat parrot in New Zealand called the Kakapo, eons of isolation left the bird overweight, flightless and rather docile, when the rats and cats and stoats arrived the Kakapo was nigh on wiped out. Europeans spent more time and energy saving the Kakapo than they so far have on saving themselves, and unlike the Kakapo, nobody will be coming to remove the rats and stoats for the Swedes, they'll have to do it for themselves.

The French, and Nice in particular, have a very different story to tell, Nice faces the Mediterranean and beyond that the African continent. A century ago a Frenchman could sit on the same promenade where a little French girl was run down yesterday, he could sip his wine knowing that the Muslim threat to his family was so small as to be irrelevant. 

Firstly, Nice itself contained garrisons of French soldiers, the people of the African continent barely had the means or ability to actually travel across the Mediterranean but even if they did there were French warships patrolling the waters. The people of North Africa were unlikely to pose any threat to the French because they were colonized by the French who ran their affairs for them, mainly in the interest of the French themselves. Brute force and self interest allowed Nice to flourish and indulge in High Culture and architecture, not egalitarian pipe-dreams.
This Must Be Earned


 European aristocrats flocked to the Côte d'Azur and quite often ventured into Africa, an aristocratic White woman could buy trinkets and take notes of the primitive culture of the locals and the Muslim men would know to cast their eyes down, merely looking at a White woman the wrong way would likely see him have his face smashed in with the butt of a rifle. That is White Privilege, and it's a moral imperative.

 The great irony is that Europe's great cities are in large part monuments to past glories, strength, vigour and will, but the Europeans themselves have had such traits sapped out of them via Judeo-Marxist mind tricks. The ability to walk around with your family in safety is a consequence of strength, when the strength leaves so does the safety.

 The present tumult does, however, offer a chance for European men to regain their strength and vigour. After the Third World invasion has been repelled and reversed, and after the traitors have been tried and hanged, then, then, the Frenchman can claim the Right to sip wine and watch adoringly as his wife and little girl innocently enjoy the fireworks display which is celebrating ''The Great Repatriation'' he can tell himself ''I earned this, I helped make this possible''.

 He can say, ''We Triumphed in the End!''.


    










↧
Search

A Message From Jack Sen: The Future Of British Nationalism?

July 18, 2016, 11:41 am
$
0
0







I was recently sent a mail by Jack Sen which I thought so hilarious in its insanity I thought it worth posting as some light relief, goodness knows we need it in these grim times. Just for those who don't know, Jack Sen has been kicking around various nationalist parties and movements in Britain for the last few years, as you shall see, Jack has quite a few problems with quite a lot of people. Many seem to think he's a few spices short of a curry. However, I can't answer to any of that, I'm simply a humble blogger. Jack dislikes me because I refused to hand over the details of somebody posting in the comments, since then I've received an unending barrage of vitriol from the man, despite what Jack says here, the only time I've ever contacted him was when replying to his abuse.

 I don't usually engage in this type of thing but, to be fair, this email is a real peach.....















Hi Jez,
An update. Something you used to ask me for daily.
Just been invited to speak on the Alex Jones network as well as give the keynote at a USS liberty event. I had a top speaker for you who served on the Lib but never heard back from you so we arranged our own event in Wyoming. Then there's the BBC doc theyre making about my work. We are still negotiating the terms but it looks like its a go.We had a channel four program lined up if you recall-they even did an article-but it fell through for some odd reason.  I will get nats back into the spotlight-of this I am certain my good man
Why am i telling you Jez?
regardless of what vile acts your friends (ppl you chose to side with in spite of your claiming neutrality)  perpetrate against me, i will prevail.I always do.why? the abuse only makes me stronger. when dave yorkshire clals me a mongrel or my wife an abusive name etc it drives me to be even more cunning. When Max Musson insults me in a speech, it only drives me to plot, plan and capitalise on the hatred these insignificant men feel for me even more. their jealousy fuels me. When matt tait tells my wife i wish i had a woman like you with tears in his eyes, it drives me forward knowing that if more men were like me, more british women would know what its like to have a real man in their lives.When agent provocateurs like Kyle hunt abuse me online simply bc my granddad was indian when there are grooming gangs about, terrorists on the loose and j media execs plotting our demise, in spite of the work im doing, it propels me forward like the great men of yesteryear. When bloggers (i think of bitches like Carolyn yeager , that pseudointellectual insignificant keyboard fag Morgoth penguin) have a go at me bc i choose to act instead of hide, I hit back-not with pseudointellectual drivel as they want, but with a firm FUCK YOU. Who are you to even write to me? I often think to myself. people with blogs that reach a few hundred ppl a day have no right to even email me. These people that would piss their knickers in my presence need to grow a set of testicles before they writr to me. Accomplish something in their insignificant lives.  (for morgoth) You are nothng. You clal me swarthy indian?? claim you are more intelligent? You are a blogger who has accomplished nothing. I met fucking Sven longshanks. Another nothing. a pimple faced dirtbag with more in common with the likes of BARACK obama than a man. You i am certian are his physical equiv./...
This is Sparta, I hear the pimplefaced, saggy assed beta keyboard commandosike Penguin shouting from behind their pcs. NO, I AM JACK SEN! A man built from the same ethos as the men that built Sparta, Aryavarta, the British empire, the United states....
2 yrs ago, i had an idea, i planned my ascent, and now I am here. Here to bring people together, and take anyone down who opposes me, causes my family and comrades harm
.Just look at this past weeks results.
Julie lake has now been suspended by the BNP due to the abuse she subjected my family to. She has been abusing me literally for 4 months along with Nick grifford, Dave Yorkshire and your other horrid mates
I reeled the heifer  in with my 'irrational responses' provoking her enough to trap her into making stupid statements publicly which i immediately sent to good friend Adam Walker, who then immediately suspended her. People need to learn that I am not going to put up with abuse, and shouldnt have to. attacks on my nationality, wife, family, background etc will not be tolerated. calling me an alcoholic that abuses his wife is not on. neither is posting my addres online and asking people on stormfront to pay me a visit. You know my wife and i have a great rapport. the sort of rapport you were envious of, that most english men dont have with their modern j culture ravaged wives.  The sort of abuse you all but condoned when tait, Musson, Yorkshire first had a go at me.  I will stomp out my enemies one by one, in as ruthless and Machiavellian a manner as i see fit.Maybe this sounds mad but my ability to lead is proof my manner and techniques work. we will grow and in time be the ONLY nationalist group with any substance in ALL of britain. we will bring good people back together and offer good brits HOPE. remember those words jez.remember the man that penned them
I want whats best for Britain, nothing else and am not going to let failures like Musson and Yorkshire harm what im trying to do. bring good ppl together for the good fo thr country. Id suggest you get back on board before its too late.your reach is slowly waning. your speakers are getting worse by the moment and relevance all but zero at this stage.
And why havent i edited this email? You ppl arent worth hitting backspace for.



If you think this is the person to usher in a bright new dawn of British Nationalism, then he's always on the lookout for a donation at ''Britren''
↧

The Public Sector Bolsheviks & The White Kulaks

July 23, 2016, 4:16 am
$
0
0







Some readers might be shocked by the graphic descriptions of sexual abuse in this article.



One of the earlier articles I wrote at this blog was a piece called ''Just Another 300 White Girls Raped And Tortured'' in which I expressed my anger and dismay at the causal manner in which the mainstream press were reporting on yet another ghastly case of English girls as young as eleven being sexually abused and tortured by non-White, Muslim men in Oxford.

 The Oxford Grooming Scandal now has its own Wikipedia entry and there's been an official investigation and report into the horror which took place:



The sexual abuse included vaginal, anal and oral rape and also involved the use of a variety of
objects such as knives, meat cleavers, baseball bats… sex toys … It was often accompanied
by humiliating and degrading conduct such as biting, scratching, acts of urinating, being…suffocated, tied up. They were also beaten and burnt. This sexual activity was often carried out by groups of men; sometimes it would go on for days on end.
The report also contains statements and questions by the girls who were abused and their parents:
''I turned up at the police station at 2/3am, blood all over me, soaked through my trousers to
the crotch. They dismissed it as me being naughty, a nuisance. I was bruised and bloody''
 ''Police… didn’t find me except once… I didn’t hide – I told people where I was'' 
 '' He urinated on me''
'' I wouldn’t ever have said no – they’d have beaten the shit out of me''
The police, council and child protection services were, needless to say, worse than useless:
''A WPC found me drunk with men. I said I was ok and she went away and left me with them.
I was abused that night''
 ''If a perpetrator can spot the vulnerable children, why can’t professionals?''
 ''A big chunk of her life has been taken away – when she should have been at the youth club
or skating or the school prom – all that went missing because of them: the perpetrators and
the police/social services for not stopping it when they knew''
 ''One manager said [before the exploitation was understood] ‘She’s streetwise, and loves it"
When 'Girl 2' walked into the police station covered with blood while internally bleeding and claimed:
 "The Asians are raping me, they drive me around to be raped by other Asians, they threatened to slice my face off and behead my family if I refused'
And the desk sergeant replied with:
"Kids today eh! now move along young lady''
The community cohesion outreach team must have breathed a sigh of relief.

 The person sitting atop the police force overseeing this carnage was one Sara Thornton, when the scandal broke Thornton flatly refused to resign. Unlike the Rotherham grooming horror show, the various branches of the public sector seemed to have learned that, having hundreds of girls raped with baseball bats and burned by cigarettes might by detrimental to public relations, and so rather than become exposed as the Neo Marxist filth they are, they instead decided to plead retard, dribbling mash-potato brain-dead levels of retard.

 For example, The Oxford report claims:
 ''Victims repeatedly told police they had been abused and sexually tortured and care-home staff just watched as the men collected the under-age girls at night.''
Thornton and the various branches of the public sector claimed ignorance, ''We didn't know!'' they chanted repeatedly as the story broke in earnest. It does, however, make you wonder how hard they looked, after all, the Daily Telegraph was able to send a journalist to Oxford who swiftly discovered via a local imam that:
''The view of some Islamic preachers towards white women can be appalling. They encourage their followers to believe that these women are habitually promiscuous, decadent, and sleazy—sins which are made all the worse by the fact that they are kaffurs or non-believers. Their dress code, from miniskirts to sleeveless tops, is deemed to reflect their impure and immoral outlook. According to this mentality, these white women deserve to be punished for their behaviour by being exploited and degraded''
They didn't know because they didn't want to know. The then Prime Minister, David Cameron, who is himself  a Globalist anti-White tool, made a statement regarding the police and local governments who 'didn't know':


David Cameron, speaking at a summit to address the issue after similar scandals in Rotherham and Oxfordshire, made a number of proposals, including up to five years in jail for teachers, councillors and social workers in England and Wales who failed to protect children, unlimited fines for individuals and organisations shown to have let children down, and a national helpline to enable professionals to report bad practice
Cameron's statement is astonishing and deserves a little attention. In Britain, in the early years of the 21st century, Neo Marxism has so comprehensively saturated the public sector and the minds of the people who work within it, that they have become pathologically incapable of feeling empathy toward White children. The great Politically Correct mind heist runs so deep that the police and teachers and child protection services have become borderline psychotic...to the degree that the Prime Minister has to threaten them with years in jail if they do not at least try and care about White children being butchered by savages.

 Eventually the box ticking diversity quota, Sara Thornton, was wafted out of the Oxford quagmire and into her new £252,000 a year job as head of the 'National Police Chiefs Council'.

 One and a half years later and the liberal establishment are reeling after the Brexit referendum. One of the surest signs that a people are living under an oppressive, dysfunctional and morally dead system of governance is that, when the system takes a knock, when it's seen to be in a weakened state, the people who hate it feel emboldened. One example of this is when the German armies swept across Eastern Europe and the first reaction of an extraordinary number of Latvians, Ukrainians and Estonians was to rise up and slaughter their Judeo-Bolshevik masters, or as is commonly written today, ''inexplicably engaged in Anti-Semitism''.

 Similarly, though infinitely less bloodily, working class Whites felt a release after they delivered a blow to their liberal overlords. Reports came flooding in of uppity English people actually asking immigrants when they were going back, a Black woman was told to ''Fuck off back to brownland'', a taxi driver used the word ''Paki'' in the presence of a Pakistani woman, they were even reports of Hate sausages being placed on the doorsteps of mosques.

 The Guardian called it a ''Frenzy of Hate'' and the political class lined up to stridently condemn the racist hate frenzy which consisted of people saying ''Oi, when you going back?''.

 The Metropolitan Police are not wasting time either, an entire department has been created to combat hate. You might think the apparatchik they found to head-up this new force would be above and beyond scrutiny, somebody not compromised in any way by a history of dismal failure when dealing with 'inter-ethnic' issues, unfortunately they chose Sara Thornton. 

 Freshly armed with a flashy new site called ''True Vision'' which encourages non-Whites to report any transgressions of racial etiquette by Whites, the formerly incompetent Thornton has now thrown herself enthusiastically into the fight against (White) hatred and racism, according to Thornton:


Like the vast, vast majority of people, I have been shocked and disgusted at some the cases of racial or anti-immigrant abuse that have been reported this week.  We have also been heartened by the people who have intervened to challenge abusive behaviour, condemn it and reassure victims that those views are not representative of Britain. 
Interestingly, we now have a ' national community tensions team' meaning our diversity is such a strength we need an entire division to monitor it round the clock:
The national community tensions team has also analysed reports from forces which today shows an increase in community tension directed at the migrant community since the referendum.   In a number of forces, migrants are reporting verbal abuse, negative social media commentary including xenophobic language, anti-migrant leafleting and, in very limited numbers, physical assaults. All of these incidents are under active investigation.
 Long gone now are the awkward gestures and feigned stupidity, the same people who shrugged their shoulders when a 13 year old White girl claimed to have been raped with a broken bottle by an Asian, now promise to investigate anyone who has the temerity to insult an Asian on Facebook. The Oxford report states:


 ......as a result, the girls were sometimes treated without common courtesies, and as one victim described it by “snide remarks”
Non-Whites can rest assured, there will be no 'snide remarks' directed toward them when they report on being called a 'Paki', or indeed, when they report that a working class White man has accused them of being child rapists. 

 The system is so obviously skewered against the natives that when that young girl went into the police station, the desk sergeant made a quick calculation, take this girl seriously and potentially lose his job, mortgage and entire life, or let it slide, move her along.

 Why risk it? she's just a White Kulak, a non-person.













↧
↧

English Nationalist vs Left Wing Socialist Anarchist

July 27, 2016, 11:39 am
$
0
0






I really enjoyed this discussion between an English Nationalist vlogger called ''England Rising'' and a ''Left Wing Anarchist'' called James Desborough. To be fair to Desborough, he isn't the worst kind of Lefty, he isn't some purple haired, howling SJW lunatic, but nevertheless, he does represent a 'Thinking Lefty' and this discussion gives a good insight into how they think and why they think what they do.

 Nationalism is beautiful because it is easy to understand, a life rooted in the natural which directs the resources of the state and general culture into offering a healthy and spiritually fulfilling existence for a people unmolested by ((outside forces)). That's pretty much it, really.

 James Desborough, by contrast, is a Left Wing Social Anarchist Libertarian(!). I have no idea how all that fits together, let alone how it would be implemented.



To his credit James does think there's some 'issues' with his political philosophy at the moment. What I enjoyed about this discussion was the incredulous manner in which England Rising questioned James on his beliefs ''Do you think, when you look around now, everything is just fine with Multiculturalism, then?''.

 One of the problems facing all Leftists is that their thinking is almost entirely based upon intellectual abstractions and ruminations by academic Jews who were primarily concerned with how these intellectual abstractions would benefit Jews when implemented, not universal humanity.

 This means that Lefties such as James Desborough were left high and dry when the time came to actually make the abstraction become a lived reality. This also means that working class Englishmen speak to middle class university grads with an armful of diplomas as if they are deluded children. The difference is, one man has set his principles on granite and the other on sand, and having erected his ideological house on sand, and not granite as the Nationalist has done, the Leftist is forever in the position of adding a rafter here or breaking through a wall there. 

 Muslims were simply never meant to be terrorizing Europe as they are now, from the gentile Leftist perspective, but they are, so now Lefties such as James Desborough tell us Islam needs a reformation and we need to make it happen, why? how? it doesn't matter, he's simply adding a steel girder to a crumbling wall. What happens if the reformation fails?, I genuinely have a sneaky suspicion it might...no doubt James will scamper up his crumbling wreck of an ideological house to weld another piece of corrugated iron to the roof.

 Still though, it's good to hear them speak amicably like this and I do hope English Rising gets a Social Justice fruitcake on at some point.

















↧

The (((Usual Suspects)))

July 30, 2016, 2:07 am
$
0
0




One of the most common euphemisms used to describe Jewish people is ''The Usual Suspects'' and the Jews themselves seem to know it and understand it as an ''Anti-Semitic trope''. The Usual Suspects is also a very well made 1995 crime thriller directed by gay Jew, Bryan Singer.  The most famous character in The Usual Suspects is ''Keyser Söze'' whose identity is shrouded in mystery, Soze himself is seemingly omnipotent, a master manipulator and source of dread for all who cross his path. 

 This article is not so much a review of The Usual Suspects movie, which is excellent, but rather an investigation into whether there is any validity to the character of Keyser Soze being what we might call an 'Anti-Semitic trope'. 


The Usual Suspects has a notoriously intricate plot which can only be briefly outlined here. The movie opens at a harbour ablaze, a multitude of corpses are floating in the water and strewn all around the harbour and a docked ship. Five men,  Verbal, Keaton, McManus, Fenster and Hockney, are rounded up and thrown onto an identity line up, the chronology of the movie then switches back and forth as one of the men, Verbal Kint (Kevin Spacey), explains what happened after the line up and the events which led to the bloodbath at the harbour, in which all of the other men were killed. Kint then explains that after the line-up the men were contacted by a representative of the feared and semi-mythical, Keyser Soze, the men were then blackmailed and manipulated by Soze into killing the one man on earth who could identify him, or 'name him'. 

 Kint, of course, is Soze, everything the audience has witnessed was Kint's view of events. As plot twists go it's simply brilliant. But what about the character, modus operandi and motivation...is Keyser Soze an Anti-Semitic canard?.


1. The Myth.


The origin of the Jewish people is something which most 'normies' haven't thought about very much, they're in the bible, they've always sort of just been there wandering from country to country. There's lots of conspiracy theories about Jews, it's all a bit vague, are they a race or a religion or what?. There's a connection to the middle east and central Europe and, of course, Germany. But mainly most Europeans simply don't know and even within circles which spend a great deal of energy researching the subject there's debates on the ''Khazar Hypothesis'' etc. 

 Keyser Soze's origins are similarly shrouded in mystery. Soze/Kint explains that ''nobody is really sure where he came from'' his father is rumoured to have been from Germany, he began his criminal career in Turkey, it is said. Soze's main enemies come from Hungary, not south or central America, as is the norm for a modern criminal mastermind operating in America.

2. Manipulation.

One of the most frequent accusations directed toward the Jewish people is that they create a chaotic situation which they then manipulate so that the outcome benefits themselves. The Usual Suspects movie is a movie about manipulation, not just of the characters within the film, but of the audience too.


3. The Victim.

As Verbal Kint, Keyser Soze adopts a severe limp and fakes a crippled hand, as well as a generally hunched and cowed physical presence. Out of the 5 men he's easily the least physically imposing and earns the nickname ''The Gimp'' from the others. By playing the victim Soze gains the sympathy of the other men and the audience. Gabriel Byrne plays 'Keaton' the most experienced, feared and respected of the other men, he's also the most sympathetic toward Kint/Soze. It is through Keaton that Soze gains influence, an influence which is never questioned because of his status as a weak and feeble victim. The great reveal at the end of The Usual Suspects is Soze shedding the victim guise and walking upright.

4. Debt.

Throughout the centuries the most frequent cause of tension between Jew and Gentile was the Jewish practice of usury, of trapping people with debt and interest upon that debt. Keyser Soze's modus-operandi is not primarily one of outright violence but of ensnaring people via a debt owed to him. Soze will offer a job to a criminal in which the criminal actually makes more money that Soze does. This tactic initially seems rather paradoxical, if not moronic, but the catch is that Soze will later return to collect on the debt and the criminal will be forced into performing some sort of suicide mission or vastly more dangerous task, violence and death will follow if the criminal refuses, presumably carried out by another criminal enslaved to Soze. 

 As The Usual Suspects unfolds it is revealed that all of the men have at some point stolen from Soze or been involved with a scam, albeit unknowingly, which originated from Soze, they all, then, owe Soze, they are all in debt to him.
The Shabbos Goy (left) performing work unfit for his master.


5. The Shabbos Goy.

An accusation often hurled at politicians is one of being a ''Shabbos Goy'' this rather demeaning term is used to describe gentiles who carry out tasks and work deemed unfit for, or below Jews. Tony Blair is often cited as a prime example of a shabbos goy. In The Usual Suspects Keyser Soze has the equivalent of a shabbos goy in the character of ''Kobayashi''. It is through Kobayashi that the men learn of their involvement and enslavement to Keyser Soze. Kobayashi appears to be Indian (Asian) and we are told he's a lawyer, he operates within legal and political circles on behalf of Soze. Soze's shabbos goy has the potential to destroy Soze, he's the only person who truly knows the character and nature of Soze and his operation, however, like Tony Blair, Kobayashi is awestruck by his master and his allegiance to his master seems to be unshakable

6. Naming The Soze.

The plot of The Usual Suspects hinges on Soze being identified by one of his old Hungarian rivals. It is Soze's dire need to eliminate this threat which drives the whole story. Because of the secretive and manipulative nature of Soze's power, having a genuine name and face pinned on him, for him to become an identifiable man, a villain at that, would be catastrophic. Unlike a Colombian drugs cartel, Soze does not have a large territory with hundreds of armed men, his power is one of secrecy, manipulation and shadowy control. Thus, if he, as a living breathing humanity being, is pinned to his crimes and exposed, the threat to him becomes exponential. Keaton, McManus, Fenster and Hockney are therefore acting more like a machine gun armed Anti Defamation League or European Jewish Congress when charged with the task of preventing Soze from being exposed, albeit unwittingly. 

7. Verbal Gymnastics.

People often point out that Jewish people are highly adept at using language, some scientific research has even revealed that the parts of the Jewish brain relating to speech tend to be more developed than those parts are in other racial and ethnic groups. Whatever the truth of that, Jewish people are famously over-represented in the realms of politics and media and various other areas such as law, which require a person to talk a great deal and at length. It's rather interesting, then, that Soze adopts the name of 'Verbal'. The audience are told via Soze/Verbal, that the name was given to him in an ironic sense, because he's rather quiet. But it isn't really true that Verbal is reticent about talking, far from it....



8. The Great Hoax.

The great twist at the end of The Usual Suspects not only reveals that Verbal Kint is Soze, but also that everything which Kint explained in the police station, everything which we as the audience thought of as 'reality' within the context of the film, was a lie, or if not a lie then it was certainly subject to what Soze wanted us to know. In a sense Keyser Soze was acting as our media, he was relating events and we, as the audience, were trying to understand and comprehend those events based upon what he was telling us. Soze is the only person left alive, so he has a monopoly on information regarding what happened.

 It could be argued that because the western media is pretty much owned by Jewish people, that we are in a similar situation as the audience watching The Usual Suspects. When we watch a film or TV show or read a newspaper we are, in effect, listening to Keyser Soze spinning a yarn again, a yarn which serves the interests of the people who own the media.

 At the finale of The Usual Suspects the audience is 'Red-Pilled' because they see the fraud, it's given to them and there's an element of shock, betrayal and confusion. The most famous line in The Usual Suspects is ''The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist''.

 But how would the devil react to people who weren't convinced, people who saw him clearly and called him out on his evil?. Would those people not be castigated as the most evil people of all time?.



I have no idea if any of this was intentional, but on a recent re-watch of The Usual Suspects from a 'Red-Pilled' perspective, it does sort of jump out at you.....













↧

Jez Turner And The South East Alliance Demand Brexit At Downing Street.

August 3, 2016, 10:28 am
$
0
0




Fantastic stuff last Friday from Jez Turner and The South East Alliance:


It is now over a month since then Prime Minister David Cameron was supposed to go to the European Union and Invoke Article 50 (Start the process of The United Kingdom leaving the EU).The South East Alliance organised a demonstration demanding that Article 50 be invoked now.
Major kudos for standing on Downing Street calling out Theresa May for being a ''Zionist puppet''.





↧
Viewing all 541 articles
Browse latest View live
Search
<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>